|
Guidelines for Using Racial
and Ethnic Groupings in Data Analyses
Revision Date: April 2010
Primary Contact:
Juliet
VanEenwyk, Ph.D., State Epidemiologist for Non-Infectious
Conditions
Purpose
Background
What Are Race and Ethnicity?
Use of Terms in This Guideline
Why Include Analyses by Racial and Ethnic Groupings in Public
Health Assessment?
What Racial and Ethnic Groupings Are Used Nationally?
Guidelines
General Considerations
Data Collection
Data Tabulation and Presentation
General Considerations
Recommended Racial and Ethnic Groupings
Alternative Racial and Ethnic Groupings
Time Trends
Appendix 1: Racial and Ethnic
Groupings in
Washington State Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance
System
Appendix 2: Methods for Assigning
Washington Residents Reporting More Than One Race to a Single
Racial Category
Appendix 3: Numbers of Events or
Respondents among Washington Residents by Race and
Ethnicity in Selected Washington State Department of
Health Datasets
Appendix 4: Comparison of Rates Using Single Race
Only and Bridged Files
Acronyms
ACS: American Community Survey
AIAN: American Indian or Alaska Native
API: Asian or Pacific Islander
BRFSS: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
CDC: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
NCHS: National Center for Health Statistics
NHOPI: Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
OMB: Office of Management and Budget
WSCR: Washington State Cancer Registry
View this document as
PDF (PDF, 1.14 MB)
>>>Next>>>
Purpose
The Assessment Operations Group in the Washington State
Department of Health coordinates the development of
guidelines related to data collection, analysis and
dissemination in order to promote good professional
practice among staff involved in assessment activities
within the Washington State Department of Health and in
Local Health Jurisdictions in Washington. While the
guidelines are intended for audiences of differing
levels of training, they assume a basic knowledge of
epidemiology and biostatistics. They are not intended to
recreate basic texts and other sources of information
related to the topics covered by the guidelines, but
rather they focus on issues commonly encountered in
public health practice and where applicable, on issues
unique to Washington State.
Background
What Are Race and
Ethnicity?
Concepts of race and ethnicity have changed
considerably over time. Today, most scientists do not
view race as a valid biological construct. Genetic
changes tend to show gradual variation across geographic
areas with social and cultural categories of race and
ethnic group being only modest proxies for continental
ancestry.1,2,3
Researchers, such as Camara Jones, propose that “race is
only a rough proxy for socioeconomic status, culture,
and genes, but it precisely captures the social
classification of people in a race-conscious society
such as the United States. … That is, the variable
‘race’ is not a biological construct that reflects
innate differences, but a social construct that
precisely captures the impacts of racism.”4(p1212)
The meanings attributed to ethnicity also vary with some
researchers emphasizing cultural heritage, while others
emphasize social identity.5
As with racism, to the extent that socio-cultural
contexts maintain disadvantage among members of specific
ethnic groups, ethnicity also captures the experience of
discrimination.
Use of
Terms in This Guideline
Because race and ethnicity are not precisely defined
constructs, scientific writers use a variety of
approaches for referring to these terms. For example,
authors sometimes place quotation marks around race and
ethnicity to remind readers of the imprecision and
heterogeneity within categories. Others discuss race and
ethnicity as one construct capturing the ambiguity of
these terms, while emphasizing their social and cultural
underpinnings. The imprecision of the constructs
themselves can be magnified by data collection
irregularities, such as when classification is based on
appearance rather than self-report.
Race and ethnicity
in this guideline refer to imprecise social and cultural
categories with which individuals identify or as
reported by next-of-kin in the case of death records.
The term “race” indicates one of the
five categories
specified in the United States Office of Management and
Budget
(OMB) 1997 Standard6
and “ethnicity” indicates Hispanic or non-Hispanic
origin. "Subpopulation" indicates a grouping within a larger racial
category, such as Chinese or Japanese within the Asian
category. For the public health technical and
professional audiences for whom this guideline is
intended, we do not use quotation marks around these
terms. We follow the conventions of the Chicago Manual
of Style 15th Edition 7
in capitalizing designations based on national and
ethnic groups, but not capitalizing those based loosely
on color when we use these terms in the text. The
conventions used in this guideline are not
intended as a recommendation. The best terminology or
ways of presenting these constructs will vary with the
document’s purpose and intended audience.
Why Include Analyses by Racial and Ethnic Groupings in Public
Health Assessment?
In the United States and in Washington State, there are
large differences in health status by self-identified
racial and ethnic categories. Reducing these disparities is
both a national and a state goal. We need to measure
health status and associated risk factors by racial and
ethnic groupings so that we understand the magnitude of the
disparities and whether current gaps are increasing or
decreasing. This knowledge can assist with developing
interventions to decrease gaps, such as developing
policies to reduce inequitable access to educational,
economic and community resources that facilitate healthy
ways of living; inequitable access to and quality of
medical care; and inequitable exposure to environmental
toxins. Additionally, health care providers and other
service organizations sometimes serve
people who primarily identify with one or a limited
number of specific racial or ethnic
categories. These providers and organizations often want to know
the health status of the populations they serve.
Assessing data by racial and ethnic groupings is one way
to obtain this perspective.
What Racial and Ethnic Groupings Are Used Nationally?
In the early 1990s, OMB reviewed Statistical Policy
Directive No. 15, the federal guidelines for reporting
race and ethnicity that had been in effect since 1977.
Based on that review, OMB issued a revised standard in
1997. The standard included an explicit statement that
the racial and ethnic categories serve social, cultural
and political purposes and should not be interpreted as
indicating primarily biological or genetic differences
among people. The three major changes in the
OMB 1997 Standard are
The minimum categories established in the
OMB 1997
Standard are
- Race
- American Indian or Alaska Native (AIAN):
A person
having origins in any of the original peoples of North
and South America (including Central America), and who
maintains tribal affiliation or community attachment.
Asian: A person having origins in any of the original
peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia, or the Indian
subcontinent, including, for example, Cambodia, China,
India, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippine
Islands, Thailand and Vietnam. Black or African American:
A person having origins in
any of the black racial groups of Africa. Terms such as
"Haitian" or "Negro" can be used in addition to "Black
or African American." Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander (NHOPI):
A
person having origins in any of the original peoples of
Hawaii, Guam, Samoa, or other Pacific Islands.
White: A person having origins in any of the original
peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa.
Ethnic Group
- Hispanic or Latino: A person of
Cuban, Mexican, Puerto Rican, South or Central
American or other Spanish culture or origin,
regardless of race. The term "Spanish origin" can be
used in addition to "Hispanic or Latino."
>>>Next>>>
|