|
|
2009
Bill Watch
Above items in gray are dead.
It is the policy of the Washington State Board of Health (
Policy 01-001 [32 KB]) to monitor and comment on issues before the Legislature that
fall into at least one of the following four categories.
- Category 1: Impacts the Board's statutory authority
- Category 2: Runs counter to a policy direction the Board has established in rule
- Category 3: Is directly related to one of the Priority Topics established by the Board
each biennium, as supported by a Board-approved work plan, interim document, or final report
- Category 4: Is directly related to a policy issue addressed in a policy statement adopted
by the Board prior to each session
In addition, the Board thought it prudent to discuss some major issues likely
to appear on the Legislature's agenda and to reach agreement on the sense of
the Board prior to session.
The
Statement of Policy on Possible 2009 Legislative Issues
[42 KB] represents the
sense of the Board on a limited number of significant issues that the Board
discussed as a whole prior to session, and is intended to guide Board staff
and individual Board members in their communications.
| Bill Number: |
HB 1157 |
| Short Title: |
Emergency information delivery |
| Prime Sponsor: |
Anderson |
| Status: |
Technically dead. |
| Digest: |
The bill would establish a workgroup to study how to improve the
delivery of emergency information to the public and deliver a report with recommendations to the Legislature and Governor by December 1,
2009. |
| Full Text: |
View
text on-line |
| Reason for Interest: |
Category 3: The Board’s strategic plan includes a goal to reduce health
disparities and calls for support of the Governor’s Interagency Council
on Health Disparities, which has a grant to increase communications
capacity with communities of color, including during emergencies. |
| Explanation: |
The bill does not consider outreach to vulnerable and hard-to-reach
populations such as those with limited English proficiency. The Board
recommends that the workgroup review the impact of emergency alert
system delivery mechanisms on hard-to-reach populations and include in
its final report recommendations on how to improve the emergency
information system to promote safety for all of Washington’s diverse
communities. In addition, the bill does not include a representative
from the Department of Health on the adjutant general’s workgroup. The
Board believes public health representation is critical since public
health plays a vital role in responding to emergencies. |
| Recommendation: |
Recommend amendments |
| Board Action: |
Letter [50 KB] with suggested amendments sent to
House Committee on Public Safety & Emergency Preparedness regarding HB
1157 |
| Staff Assigned: |
Christy Curwick Hoff |
|
Back to Top |
| |
| Bill Number: |
2SHB 1165 | SB 5279 |
| Short Title: |
Unwanted drug disposal |
| Prime Sponsor: |
Morrell | Kline |
| Status: |
Technically dead. |
| Digest: |
View
digest on-line |
| Full Text: |
View
text on-line |
| Reason for Interest: |
Category 4: The Board’s policy statement supports pharmaceutical take
back programs |
| Explanation: |
This bill would require pharmaceutical manufacturers to participate in a
product stewardship program for unwanted drugs held by consumers. The
programs could be run by individual producers or cooperatively through
stewardship organizations. The SBOH would like to see development of
sustainable programs to take back unused pharmaceuticals to prevent
inappropriate or accidental use. The Board is particularly concerned
about opioid misuse and abuse. The substitute bill includes controlled
substances (narcotics). Unfortunately, inclusion of controlled
substances might be held invalid because federal rules restrict
pharmaceutical take back programs from including them. |
| Recommendation: |
Support concept with concern. Send Letter. |
| Board Action: |
See letters on
HB1165 [50 KB] and
SB 5279 [52 KB] |
| Staff Assigned: |
Ned Therien and
Tara Wolff |
|
Back to Top |
| |
| Bill Number: |
HB 1322 | SB 5074 (not companion bills) |
| Short Title: |
School scoliosis screening |
| Prime Sponsor: |
Green | Marr |
| Status: |
HB 1322 passed both House and the Governor signed it on April 9. The law
will take effect on July 26, 2009. SB 5074 is technically dead. |
| Digest: |
Repeals the program for scoliosis screening in schools. |
| Full Text: |
View
text on line of HB 1322 |
SB 5074 |
| Reason for Interest: |
Category 1: This bill would rescind the Board’s statutory
authority to adopt rules for scoliosis screening. |
| Explanation: |
These
bills are not true companions but identical except HB 1322 has an intent
section and SB 5074 does not. The Board believes screening asymptomatic
adolescents for scoliosis in a school setting is not evidence-based. It
passed a motion in January 2008 supporting the concept of
rescinding mandatory school-based scoliosis screening. |
| Recommendation: |
Support |
| Board Action: |
Craig McLaughlin signed in
support for both bills in their houses of origination. Tara Wolff signed
in support for both bills when they moved to the other side of the
house. |
| Staff Assigned: |
Tara Wolff |
|
Back to Top |
| |
| Bill Number: |
HB 1365 |
| Short Title: |
Food service rules |
| Prime Sponsor: |
Ericksen |
| Status: |
Technically dead. |
| Digest: |
View
digest on-line |
| Full Text: |
View
text on-line |
| Reason for Interest: |
Category 1: The Board currently has authority to consider the
most current version of the FDA Food Code when adopting rules for food
service establishments. Category 2: The Board has adopted 2001
FDA Food Code national standards for food establishments in Chapter
246-215 WAC. |
| Explanation: |
The SBOH adopted the 2001 FDA Food Code by reference in 2004 largely
without change. The rules include a requirement that refrigeration for
potentially hazardous foods be at 41° F or below, except up to 45° F is
allowed for existing equipment until May 2010 if it was purchased before
May 2005. The rules provide local health officers with authority to give
variances on a case-by-case basis. This bill would indefinitely extend
the exemption for refrigeration equipment purchased before May 2005.
The 2001 FDA Food Code contained the provision for exempting
refrigeration equipment from the 41° F requirement for 5 years. The 2007
Supplement to the FDA Food Code does not include a phase-in period to
meet the 41° F requirement. This is based on best available science
increasingly identifying the need for the lower food storage temperature
to prevent multiplication of Listeria, a potentially deadly type of
bacteria. |
| Recommendation: |
Oppose |
| Board Action: |
Executive Director testified as opposed at Feb 10 hearing |
| Staff Assigned: |
Ned Therien |
|
Back to Top |
| |
| Bill Number: |
SHB 1416 | SB 5361 |
| Short Title: |
Feeding hungry children |
| Prime Sponsor: |
Sullivan | McDermott |
| Status: |
Technically dead. |
| Digest: |
View digest on-line for
SHB 1416 and
SB 5361 |
| Full Text: |
View text on-line for
SHB 1416 and
SSB 5361 |
| Reason for Interest: |
Category 4: The Board’s policy statement supports using science
and public health best practice to improve nutrition in schools. This
includes improving the quality and availability of school meal programs. |
| Explanation: |
In times of rising unemployment, more families are likely to experience
food insecurity or hunger. Feeding low-income children is critical on
many fronts including children’s ability to perform well academically.
Washington state Healthy Youth Survey data indicates an association
between not eating breakfast and academic risk. Studies of school
breakfast programs show improved nutrition and academic achievement.
Necessary funding of roughly $4 million per biennium is not in Governor’s
budget. |
| Recommendation: |
Support concept. Send letter. |
| Board Action: |
See letters on
HB 1416 [52 KB] and
HB 5361 [52 KB] |
| Staff Assigned: |
Tara Wolff |
|
Back to Top |
| |
| Bill Number: |
HB 1632 |
| Short Title: |
Annual school performance reporting |
| Prime Sponsor: |
Seaquist |
| Status: |
Technically dead. |
| Digest: |
View
digest on-line. |
| Full Text: |
View
text on-line. |
| Reason for Interest: |
Category 2: Related to school environmental health and safety
rule. |
| Explanation: |
Board removed report requirements in drafts of school rules because of
questions about limits on its authority. Staff and parents strongly
advocated for public reporting. This bill would achieve reporting
through existing channels, keeping the administrative burden on schools
to a minimum. |
| Recommendation: |
Support provisions related to school health and safety. Send letter. |
| Board Action: |
See letter on
HB 1632 [50 KB] |
| Staff Assigned: |
Ned Therien |
|
Back to Top |
| |
| Bill Number: |
ESHB 1703 | SB 5707 |
| Short Title: |
Child immunization exemptions |
| Prime Sponsor: |
Cody | Keiser |
| Status: |
Technically dead. |
| Digest: |
Requires certain documents for child immunization exemptions (SB 5707).
Requires a
certificate of exemption for child immunization exemptions (SHB 1703). |
| Full Text: |
View text on-line for
ESHB 1703 |
SB 5707 |
| Reason for Interest: |
Category 2&4 for SB 5707:
The Board policy statement endorses well-considered efforts to
discourage overuse of exemptions. Board rules allow medical doctors,
osteopaths, naturopaths, physician assistants, or nurse practitioners
to authorize medical exemptions. SB 5707 only allows licensed
physicians to issue a medical exemption. Board rules allow parents
(defined as (a) the mother, father, legal guardian, or any adult in loco
parentis of a child 17 years of age or older, (b) a person 18 years of
age or older, or (c) an emancipated minor) to claim a philosophical or
personal exemption by signing a Certificate of Exemption. SB 5707 would
require two notarized documents to obtain such an exemption. One of the
documents would come from a licensed physician, physician assistant, or
nurse indicating that the parent, legal guardian, or person acting in
loco parentis has received information about the benefits and risks of
immunization. The other document would be signed by the parent, legal
guardian, or person acting in loco parentis.
SHB
1703 has addressed these concerns (above). |
| Explanation: |
The
Board supports the goals of both bills. But the Board has concerns about
SB 5707 which incorporates provisions that are not clearly public
health-related. The Board supports the concept of providing parents with
vaccine information that is scientifically based, and information on the
implications of their decision in the event of an outbreak. However,
the Board would be cautious about an approach that requires notarized
documentation. The immunization rule on medical exemptions is out of
synch with SB 5707. The Board would like subsection (2) in section 1 of
the bill to say “or other health care providers as allowed by Board
rule” or specify a broader list of providers in RCW. |
| Recommendation: |
Support concept. Recommend amendment. Testify |
| Board Action: |
See
written testimony
[44 KB]. Craig McLaughlin signed
in support of SHB 1703 and was available for questions. |
| Staff Assigned: |
Tara Wolff |
|
Back to Top |
| |
| Bill Number: |
2SHB 1985 |
| Short Title: |
Public health financing |
| Prime Sponsor: |
Moeller |
| Status: |
Technically dead. |
| Digest: |
View
digest on line. |
| Full Text: |
View
text on line. |
| Reason for Interest: |
Category 3: The Board’s strategic plan includes an objective of
strengthening the organizational capacity of the public health system. |
| Explanation: |
This
bill is intended to help provide local public health jurisdictions with
more stable dedicated funding. It would provide continuing funding
assistance for local health and would require the secretary of DOH to
establish a review process to evaluate local health compliance with
minimum standards in the Public Health Improvement Plan every two years
in order to continue to get this state funding. It would repeal
requirements that prohibit state funds being used to supplant existing
local funding during the current biennium. |
| Recommendation: |
Support concept |
| Board Action: |
The Executive Director signed in at February 10 hearing on original bill in support of
concept. |
| Staff Assigned: |
Ned Therien |
|
Back to Top |
| |
| Bill Number: |
HB 2070 | SSB 5779 |
| Short Title: |
School health and safety rules |
| Prime Sponsor: |
Sullivan | McAuliffe |
| Status: |
Technically dead.. |
| Digest: |
Recognizes that the legislature cannot practically implement the state
board of health's proposed school environmental health and safety rules
without an extended phase-in period in light of other budget
constraints. |
| Full Text: |
View text on line of
HB 2070 |
SSB
5779 |
| Reason for Interest: |
Category 1:
These bills would revise the Board’s statutory authority regarding school
environmental health and safety rules. |
| Explanation: |
These bills would require the Board to present its school environmental health and
safety rules and a final cost estimate to the Legislature before the
rules could be implemented. The legislature must then approve the rules
before they could be implemented. This may take a phased-in approach.
The substitute senate bill establishes a time period between January 1,
2009 and January 1, 2005 when this would be required; encourages school
districts to voluntarily comply with the rule during this period; and
adds an emergency clause.
The bills are not clear about the Board’s authority to adopt the rules--they
restrict implementation of the rules. They are not clear
regarding applicability to existing rules versus proposed revisions.
They are not clear what additional presentation and cost estimates are
needed beyond those already provided or required for rule making by the
Administrative Procedures Act. They are not clear whether approval for
implementation would be required for each budget cycle. The Board seeks
to work with legislators to clarify bill language and explore methods
for implementation of basic environmental health and safety protections
for students in schools, such as through phased-in funding. |
| Recommendation: |
Concerns, recommend amendments. |
| Board Action: |
The Executive Director testified at legislative policy committee
hearings for both bills. |
| Staff Assigned: |
Ned Therien |
|
Back to Top |
| |
| Bill Number: |
SHB 2147 | E2SSB 5973 | HB 2149 |
| Short Title: |
Achievement gap |
| Prime Sponsor: |
Liias | Kauffman | McCoy |
| Status: |
E2SSB 5973 has passed and been
sent to Governor. SHB 2147 and HB 2149 are technically dead. |
| Digest: |
SHB 2147 |
SSSB 5973 |
HB 2149 |
| Full Text: |
SHB 2147 |
SSSB 5973 |
HB 2149 |
| Reason for Interest: |
Category 3: The Board’s strategic plan includes a goal to reduce
health disparities and calls for support of the Governor’s Interagency
Council on Health Disparities, which has selected education as one of
its priorities for the first version of its action plan. |
| Explanation: |
The Board has long supported efforts to reduce the academic achievement
gap, as education is a clear social determinant of health and the
promotion of health equity and the reduction of health disparities is a
longstanding goal of the Board. These bills attempt to implement
recommendations from five studies on academic achievement gaps. The
Board supports keeping the recommendations on the state’s public policy
agenda. 2SSB 5973 would create an oversight and accountability committee
staffed by the Center for the Improvement of Student Learning to
recommend policies and strategies to address the achievement gap, would
require the Professional Educator Standards Board to recommend model
standards for cultural competency and to provide assistance to school
districts to advance cultural competence skills in the workforce,
directs the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction to
disaggregate student data in reports for specific racial/ethnic and
other subgroups and to secure federal funds to support enhanced data
collection and other model programs and innovations. HB 2149 would have
awarded a planning grant to create an implementation plan for millennium
schools, if funds were appropriated. SHB 2147 would have established an
oversight and accountability committee to provide guidance and
recommendations on measures and strategies to close the achievement gap.
It also would have directed OSPI to create an implementation plan for up
to three Innovation Academies. |
| Recommendation: |
Support concept |
| Board Action: |
Letter sent on
HB 2147 and HB 2149
[52 KB]. Letter sent on
SB 5973
[52 KB]. Letter sent on
SSSB 5973. |
| Staff Assigned: |
Christy Curwick Hoff |
|
Back to Top |
| |
| Bill Number: |
2SHB 2167 | ESSB 5889 |
| Short Title: |
Providing flexibility in the education system |
| Prime Sponsor: |
Maxwell | Hobbs |
| Status: |
Engrossed substitute SB 5889 passed and has been delivered to the
Governor. |
| Digest: |
Provides flexibility in the education system to reduce costs. |
| Full Text: |
View text on line for
2SHB 2167 and
ESSB 5889 |
| Reason for Interest: |
Category 2 & 4: HB 2167 and SB 5889 would suspend compliance
with a Board rule requiring schools to provide visual and auditory
screening to students. Policy statement endorses policies that increase
capacity to pursue full immunization of children and both bills could
jeopardize federal immunization funding. |
| Explanation: |
The Board had concerns with sections 6, 7 and 10 of the original
companion bills. Section 10 would suspend a reporting requirement
concerning the immunization status of school children. This would
prevent the Department of Health from complying with the requirement of
a federal immunization grant that provided $180.3 million to the state
this biennium. Sections 6 and 7 would suspend visual and auditory
screening in schools. Allowing vision and auditory problems to go
undetected even for two years could lead to academic setbacks for
students. Both substitutes restored the immunizations reporting
requirement. SHB 2167 restored visual and auditory screening, but SSB
5889 restored screening only for special education children and children
eligible for free or reduced lunch. A 5889 striker restored visual and
auditory screening for all children, and allowed visual screening in
schools to be performed by ophthalmologists, optometrists, or opticians
who donate their professional services. |
| Recommendation: |
Send letter or sign in with concerns. |
| Board Action: |
See letter for
HB 2167
[51 KB]. Craig McLaughlin signed in with concerns
at hearing for HB 5889. See letter for
ESSB 5889
[50 KB]. See letter for
2SHB 2167
[50 KB] |
| Staff Assigned: |
Tara Wolff |
|
Back to Top |
| |
| Bill Number: |
ESHB 2261 |
| Short Title: |
State’s Education System |
| Prime Sponsor: |
House Education Appropriations (formerly Sullivan) |
| Status: |
ESHB 2261 has passed and been sent to Governor. |
| Digest: |
|
| Full Text: |
View
text on-line |
| Reason for Interest: |
Category 3: The Board’s strategic plan includes a goal to reduce health
disparities and calls for support of the Governor’s Interagency Council
on Health Disparities, which has selected education as one of its
priorities to eliminate health disparities. |
| Explanation: |
The Board has long supported efforts to reduce the academic achievement
gap, as education is a clear social determinant of health and the
promotion of health equity and the reduction of health disparities is a
longstanding goal of the Board. An amendment was adopted for this basic
education bill, which would establish an oversight and accountability
committee to synthesize the recommendations from the five achievement
gap studies into a single implementation plan. The amendment was not
included in the final bill as passed the Legislature. Pieces related to
the academic achievement gap in the final bill included authorizing the
quality education council to include in its recommendations goals and
priorities to eliminate the achievement gap and reduce dropout rates and
authorizing the State Board of Education to develop an accountability
index to identify schools/districts in need of additional support so
those schools/districts may undergo additional analysis to assess gaps
and community support issues. The Board supports keeping the achievement
gap recommendations on the state’s public policy agenda and also
supported in concept SHB 2147 and 2SSB 5973 |
| Recommendation: |
Support concept |
| Board Action: |
See
letter for ESHB 2261
[50 KB]. |
| Staff Assigned: |
Christy Curwick Hoff |
|
Back to Top |
| |
| Bill Number: |
SB 5336 |
| Short Title: |
Dogs in bars and coffee shops |
| Prime Sponsor: |
Jacobsen |
| Status: |
Technically dead. |
| Digest: |
View
digest on-line |
| Full Text: |
View
text on-line |
| Reason for Interest: |
Category 1: The Board currently has authority to adopt rules for
food service establishments.
Category 2: The Board has adopted 2001 FDA Food Code standards,
which include prohibiting pets in food establishments. An outdoor eating
area of a food establishment is considered part of the establishment. |
| Explanation: |
SBOH food service rules have prohibited pets in food establishments for
decades, based on national standards from FDA and the US Public Health
Service. The Board adopted the FDA Food Code by reference in 2004
largely without change. Local health officers implement the rules in
retail establishments. The rules provide local health officers with
authority to give variances on a case-by-case basis.
This bill would set up a pilot program to allow dogs in outdoor
eating areas of certain food service establishments. The bill sets
conditions to mitigate potential health hazards. It gives discretion to
the local regulatory authority to adopt an ordinance to allow an
exemption from the Food Code requirements. The Board recommends
amendments to mesh this process with existing authority of local boards
of health and correct references to the Board, rather than Department of
Health. |
| Recommendation: |
Recommend amendments |
| Board Action: |
Suggested amendments sent to legislative staff. Executive Director
signed in at Feb 9 hearing as available for questions. |
| Staff Assigned: |
Ned Therien |
|
Back to Top |
| |
| Bill Number: |
SSB 5551 |
| Short Title: |
Regarding recess periods for elementary school students |
| Prime Sponsor: |
Franklin |
| Status: |
SSB 5551 has passed and sent to Governor. |
| Digest: |
Requires the office of the superintendent of public
instruction to collaborate with the statewide parent-teacher
organization to conduct and report the results of a survey of Washington
elementary schools to determine the current availability of recess for
elementary students and the perceptions of the importance of recess in
Washington elementary schools. |
| Full Text: |
View
full text on-line |
| Reason for Interest: |
Category 4: The Board’s policy statement supports using science
and public health best practice to improve physical activity in schools.
This includes requiring that adequate time be set aside for recess and
physical activity during the school day. |
| Explanation: |
The Board recommends that in addition to considering the benefits of
recess on children’s health, the benefits of fitness on academic
achievement should also be taken into account in the intent section of
the bill. |
| Recommendation: |
Support |
| Board Action: |
Craig McLaughlin testified in
support in the house of origination.
See written testimony.[38 KB].
Tara Wolff signed in support of SSB 5551 when it moved to the other side
of the house. |
| Staff Assigned: |
Tara Wolff |
|
Back to Top |
| |
| Bill Number: |
SSB 5588 |
| Short Title: |
Boards and commissions |
| Prime Sponsor: |
Pridemore |
| Status: |
Technically dead. |
| Digest: |
View
digest on-line |
| Full Text: |
View substitute
text on-line |
| Reason for Interest: |
Category 1: Suspends
section of Board’s authorizing statute creating the Governor’s
Interagency Council on Health Disparities. |
| Explanation: |
The Board’s strategic plan calls for reducing health disparities and one of
the objectives is to support the success of the health disparities
council. This bill, which impacts 158 entities, would suspend the
council until July 1, 2011. Governor would need to complete a report by
July 1, 2010 with recommendations on future of boards, commissions,
committees and councils. State would lose federal state partnership
grant because it would no longer have a qualifying state office of
minority health. |
| Recommendation: |
Send letter with concerns. |
| Board Action: |
See
letter on
SB 5588
[51 KB] |
| Staff Assigned: |
Craig McLaughlin |
|
Back to Top |
| |
| Bill Number: |
SB 5756 |
| Short Title: |
Concerning hazardous substance information |
| Prime Sponsor: |
Oemig |
| Status: |
Technically dead. |
| Digest: |
View
text on-line |
| Full Text: |
View
text on-line |
| Reason for Interest: |
Category 4: The Board supports efforts to correct misinformation
about vaccine safety and to educate the public about the importance of
immunizations. |
| Explanation: |
Unless amended to exclude approved uses of licensed medical products,
this bill would require health care providers to give their patients
medically and scientifically inaccurate information about vaccines based
on standards for a federal data system to track industrial and municipal
waste that have no relationship to safe levels of human exposure. The
administration of any vaccines containing thimerosal, even trace
amounts, would need to be accompanied by a warning that the vaccine
contains mercury at a level that would qualify the vaccine itself as
hazardous material. Such a warning would likely discourage immunization. |
| Recommendation: |
Send letter. Oppose unless amended. |
| Board Action: |
See letter on
SB 5756
[51 KB] |
| Staff Assigned: |
Ned Therien |
|
Back to Top |
| |
| Bill Number: |
ESSB 5890 |
| Short Title: |
Education system flexibility |
| Prime Sponsor: |
McDermott |
| Status: |
Technically dead. |
| Digest: |
Provides flexibility in the education system to reduce costs. |
| Full Text: |
View
text on-line |
| Reason for Interest: |
Category 3 & 4: Both strategic plan and policy statement support efforts
to increase children’s physical activity. |
| Explanation: |
Original bill would have repealed RCW 28A.230.040 and .050, which
establish physical education requirements for schools. Physical
education contributes not only to better health and potentially lower
rates of obesity and overweight, but it has been repeatedly linked to
better academic performance. The substitute addressed the Board’s
concerns since it would not repeal RCW 28A.230.040 and .050. |
| Recommendation: |
Express concerns about physical education provisions. |
| Board Action: |
Craig McLaughlin signed in with concerns at Feb. 18 hearing. |
| Staff Assigned: |
Tara Wolff |
|
Back to Top |
| |
| Bill Number: |
SSB 5958 |
| Short Title: |
Vision screening for public school students |
| Prime Sponsor: |
Oemig |
| Status: |
Technically dead. |
| Digest: |
Authorizes additional visual screening for public school students who
exhibit a striking behavior or discipline change, or a sudden drop in
academic performance to determine whether the change in behavior,
discipline, or grades is due to visual impairment. |
| Full Text: |
View
text on-line |
| Reason for Interest: |
Category 2:
Differs somewhat from Board rule which requires school personnel who
observe a child with signs of eye problems that negatively influence the
child’s performance to refer the child to his or her parents (or
guardians) for professional care. This bill would have “personnel”
(including professional volunteers) perform additional tests. |
| Explanation: |
Board was part of a workgroup that produced a report to the Legislature on
vision screening in 2008. The original bill specified functional vision
screening which is generally not recommended for K-12 age range unless
they have special needs. |
| Recommendation: |
Neutral. Provide informational testimony. |
| Board Action: |
Craig McLaughlin testified on February 18. |
| Staff Assigned: |
Tara Wolff |
|
Back to Top |
|
See also:
Bill Watch 2008 |
Bill Watch 2007
Bill Watch 2006 |
Bill Watch 2005 |
Bill Watch 2004
Bill Watch 2003 |
Bill Watch 2002
Washington State Legislature
|