DOH Home Page

Red Ribbon HIV/AIDS Prevention and Education Services
Effective Interventions and Strategies - Recommended Interventions for Injection Drug Users

You are here: DOH Home » CFH  » HIV/AIDS Prevention and Education » Recommended Interventions for IDU

Search | Employees

 Site Directory:

   

Effective Interventions and Strategies

• Effective Intervention and Strategies Home Page

• Intervention Type Definitions

• HIV Positive Person Interventions

• MSM Interventions

• IDU Interventions

• Heterosexual Interventions

• Definitions of Theories and Models

• HERR Core Elements

• Checklist for Intervention Programs

• Resources

• Behavior Determinants

 

 

• HIV Prevention Home Page

 

• Community & Family Health Home Page


Access Washington Button

 

 

• Download Viewers

 Recommendations for Interventions by the Effective Interventions and Strategies Workgroup

 

IDU - Methadone Treatment

IDU - Syringe Exchange

IDU - Individual Level Intervention

IDU - Prevention Case Management

IDU - Group Level Interventions

IDU - Community Level Interventions

IDU - Street and Community Outreach

IDU - Intervention Combination

IDU - Counseling and Testing

IDU - Partner Notification

IDU - Other

IDU Interventions Summary (includes 2007 updates) (PDF 129kb)

2007 IDU Interventions (new only) (PDF 40kb)

Injection Drug Users

Literature Summary

Methadone Treatment - IDU
Many articles support the effectiveness of methadone treatment as an HIV prevention intervention for heroin users. The studies show that methadone treatment reduces needle use, sharing and number of sex partners.  Rather than summarizing each article, this document provides several citations to help users begin to access the literature on this topic.

Gibson DR, Flynn NM, and McCarthy JJ (1999). Effectiveness of methadone treatment in reducing HIV risk behavior and HIV seroconversion among injecting drug users. AIDS 13: 1807-1818.

Hubbard RL, Marsden ME, Rachel JV, et al. (1989). Drug Abuse Treatment: A National Study of Effectiveness (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1989), cited in The Effectiveness of AIDS Prevention Efforts (Washington DC: Office of Technology Assessment).

Langendam MW, van Brussel GHA, Coutinho RA, et al. (1999). Methadone maintenance treatment modalities in relation to incidence of HIV: results of the Amsterdam cohort study. AIDS 13: 1711-1716.

Rhoades HM, Creson D, Elk R, et al. (1998). Retention, HIV risk, and illicit drug use during treatment: methadone dose and visit frequency. American Journal of Public Health 88: 34-39.

Syringe Exchange - IDU                                                           Back to Top
Many articles support the effectiveness of syringe exchange as an HIV prevention intervention for injection drug users. The studies show that syringe exchange programs reduce sharing and increase referrals to drug treatment programs, without increasing injection drug use. Rather than summarizing each article, this document provides several citations to help users begin to access the literature on this topic.

Ashery, RS, Davis H, Davis WH, et al. (1993). Entry into treatment of IDUs based on the association of outreach workers with treatment programs. Handbook on Risk of AIDS, Brown BS and Beschner GM (eds.) (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press), cited in The Effectiveness of AIDS Prevention Efforts (Washington DC: Office of Technology Assessment).

Bluthenthal RN, Kral AH, Gee L, et al. (2000). The effect of syringe exchange use on high-risk injection drug users: a cohort study. AIDS 14: 605-611.

Hagan H, Des Jarlais DC, Friedman SR, et al. (1995). Reduced risk of Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C among injecting drug users participating in the Tacoma Syringe Exchange Program. American Journal of Public Health 85: 1531-1537.

O’Brien M, Murray JR, Rahemian A, et al. (1994). Three topics from the Chicago Needle Exchange Cohort Study: seroconversion; the behavior of HIV-positive NX users; and the need for additional prevention around non-needle injection risks. Annual North American Syringe Exchange Conference, Santa Cruz, CA, cited in The Effectiveness of AIDS Prevention Efforts (Washington DC: Office of Technology Assessment).

O’Keefe E, Kaplan E, and Khoshnood K (1991). Preliminary Report: City of New Haven Needle Exchange Program (New Haven, CT: New Haven Health Department), cited in The Effectiveness of AIDS Prevention Efforts (Washington DC: Office of Technology Assessment).

Oliver K, Maynard H, Friedman SR, et al. (1994). Behavioral and community impact of the Portland Syringe Exchange Program. Proceedings of the Workshop on Needle Exchange and Bleach Distribution Programs (Washington, DC: National Academy Press), cited in The Effectiveness of AIDS Prevention Efforts (Washington DC: Office of Technology Assessment).

Individual-Level - IDU                                                                   Back to Top
Sterk, C. E. (2002) The health intervention project: HIV risk reduction among African America women drug users. Public Health Reports. 2002 Volume 117, Supplemental 1, S88-S95.
Subpopulation Researched Intervention Design Evaluated Outcome
African American women who use crack This Health Intervention Project (HIP) was conducted in Georgia for African American crack users.  The HIP consisted of two interventions based on the Stages of Change Model.  The four session motivation intervention, including HIV pre and posttest counseling.  During the sessions, the women developed an action plan, reviewed successes and failures, revised personal goals, recognized triggers for relapse and developed ways to avoid or respond to those cues. The four session negotiation intervention focused on technical and communication skills.  The women developed an action plan and reviewed the plan during each session. No specific information about this intervention was provided. However, lessons learned from this intervention determined successful interventions must be holistic.  Effective prevention intervention programs must be framed within appropriate racial, ethnic, and cultural context.
Stephens RC, Feucht TE, et al. (1993) Effects of an Intervention Program on AIDS-Related Drug and Needle Behavior Among Intravenous Drug Users. American Journal of Public Health 81(5): 568-571.
Subpopulation Researched Intervention Design Evaluated Outcome
POC
(African-American Male)
322 (mostly street addicts not in tx) participated in 1:1 counseling delivered by a professionally trained health educator and lasted 45-60 minutes. Session provided basic information on HIV transmission using a segment of a film; discussed sexual risk reduction and condom use; covered ways to reduce risk due to injection drug use and ended with information on HIV testing. Pre-post results compared baseline to 3-month follow-up interview. Percent reporting injecting decreased from 92 to 71, sharing decreased from 67 to 24. Didn’t ask questions about sexual risks.
Prevention Case Management - IDU                                                Back to Top
The CDC has endorsed Prevention Case Management (PCM) as an effective intervention to reach HIV positive and/or very high-risk HIV negative persons.  PCM is a client-centered HIV prevention activity with the fundamental goal of promoting the adoption and maintenance of HIV risk reduction behaviors by clients with multiple, complex problems and risk reduction needs.  PCM provides client-centered, multiple-session HIV risk reduction counseling while using the service brokerage of traditional case management to address competing needs that may make HIV prevention a lower priority.  This HIV prevention activity addresses the relationship between HIV risk and other issues such as substance use, mental health, adherence issues, social and cultural factors, and physical health problems.  While PCM has yet to be rigorously evaluated, intensive case management interventions for clients with multiple, complex problems have been shown to be effective in other health fields. 

CDC HIV Prevention Case Management – Guidance   September 1997

CDC HIV Prevention Case Management – Literature Review and Current Practice   September 1997

CDC Abbreviations and Acronyms

Group-Level - IDU                                                                          Back to Top
Cottler LB, Compton WM et al. (1998) Peer-Delivered Intervention Reduces HIV Risk Behaviors among Out-of-Treatment Drug Abusers. Public Health Report 113(1): 31-41
Subpopulation Researched Intervention Design Evaluated Outcome
POC/ African-Am St. Louis Program (Each OneTeach One). N=725, 61% male, 93% African-American. A peer role model for out-of-tx crack cocaine users and IDU. Role Models conducted outreach to reach persons on the street spending 5 to 15 minutes contact with users, then random assignment to standard (SI) or enhanced intervention (EI). All participants in two sessions of drug and HIV info and C&T, then EI participants randomly selected to attend four 2-hour peer-led intervention groups on drug awareness, stress management, AIDS, risk reduction for sexual behavior. 3-month follow-up. Over 80% of the sample (both groups) maintained their crack cocaine use at low-level or reduced their use. Enhanced group more likely to reduce risk. Condom use in both groups decreased. Men in EI more likely to reduce crack use than SI men. No difference between women in two groups.
Deren S, Tortu S. et al. (1993) An AIDS Risk Reduction Project with Inner-city Women, Women and AIDS: Psychological Perspectives. London: Sage.
Subpopulation Researched Intervention Design Evaluated Outcome
POC/ Women
(African- Am/Latino)
Women were randomly assigned to two groups.
Group 1: a single group session providing AIDS education and testing/risk reduction referral information.
Group 2: three group session, covering the above plus condom use/needle-cleaning and negotiation skills.
Women in both interventions showed significant decrease in average monthly number of unprotected sex acts (37 to 19) and number of partners (31 to 15) in the last 6 months. Increased percent condoms use with main partner (18% to 43%) and with multiple partners (43% to 64%) at 6-month follow-up.
Des Jarlais, C.C., Casriel, C., et al. (1992) AIDS and the Transition to Illicit Drug Injection – Results of a Randomized Trial Prevention Program.  British Journal of Addiction 87(3): 493-498.
Subpopulation Researched Intervention Design Evaluated Outcome
  Study to see if teaching safer injecting practices would cause injecting to increase among drug sniffers.  104 NYC HIV negative heroin users who were using intranasaly (sniffing) as their primary route of heroin use and who had injected no more than 60 times in the previous two years.  Trained peer-mediator conducted four 60-90 minute group sessions over a two-week period, which included AIDS 101, safer injection, sexual behavior, and drug abuse treatment programs.  Controls filled out surveys that were in-depth interviews. Significant lower level of injection at follow-up (average follow-up period = 9 months).  Did not prevent all drug injection. 15% assigned to the intervention injected during the follow-up period, compared with 33% of those assigned to the control group.  There however was no evidence that the intervention was effect at improving safer sex.
El-Bassel N, Schilling RF (1992) 15- Month Follow-up of Women Methadone Patients Taught Skills to reduce Heterosexual HIV Transmission. Public Health Reports 107(5): 500-4.
Subpopulation Researched Intervention Design Evaluated Outcome
IDU/ POC
(African-Am/ Hispanic)
15-month follow-up of study summarized above (Schilling RF, EL-Bassel et al. (1991) Building Skills of Recovering Women Drug Users to Reduce Heterosexual AIDS Transmission. Public Health Reports 106(3): 297-304). Compared to the information-only group, women in the skills-building group showed an increase in frequency of condom use at 15-month follow-up. The groups did not differ significantly in number of sex partners.
Malow RE, West JA et al. (1994) Outcome of Psychoeducation of HIV risk reduction. AIDS Education and Prevention 6(2): 113-125.
Subpopulation Researched Intervention Design Evaluated Outcome
POC/ Drug use (African American cocaine users) 152 African American males at in-patient tx program participated in group-level sessions. Non-peer led, held for 2 hours over 3 consecutive days, 6-8 people. Sessions included HIV knowledge/ risk, demonstrated cleaning works; condom use, condom negotiating, and skills-building exercises; review and discussion of HIV testing procedures. 47.5% of intervention group participants reported having more than one partner at three-month follow-up compared to 76% at the baseline, in the comparison group.  The change from 76% at baseline to 59% at the follow was considered to be not statistically significant. Sexual risk taking in those receiving the intervention was reduced from 75% (pre intervention) to 32% (follow-up).
McCusker J, Stoodard AM et al. (1992) AIDS Education for Drug Abusers: Evaluation of Short-term Effectiveness. American Journal of Public Health 82(4): 533-540.
Subpopulation Researched Intervention Design Evaluated Outcome
In drug tx Massachusetts. 567 clients in a 21-day inpatient drug detoxification program. 67% male, 81% white. Blocked randomization. Group 1: standard AIDS education program typically provided in treatment settings, consisted of two 1-hour group sessions given early or late in tx involving video, lectures, homework, discussion, and demonstrations of condom use and of cleaning drug equipment. Group 2: enhanced intervention, six 1-hour group sessions and a 30 min individual health education consultation that focused on personal susceptibility, situational analysis and skills-building. Authors disappointed in results. Reduction in risky drug use reported by all groups. Only significant result: enhanced group reported significantly greater reduction in injection frequency than did group 1.
Schilling RF, EL-Bassel et al. (1991) Building Skills of Recovering Women Drug Users to Reduce Heterosexual AIDS Transmission. Public Health Reports 106(3): 297-304.
Subpopulation Researched Intervention Design Evaluated Outcome
Women/ POC 91 African-American and Hispanic women enrolled for at least 3 months in five clinics in large methadone maintenance program in NYC. Non-peer led skills-building groups held five 2-hour sessions offered to groups of 9-10. Topics included: HIV 101; identification of high-risk sexual practices; discussion of barriers to adopting safer sex practices; discussion of negative associations with condoms; condom use skills; role-played negotiation of condom use; assertiveness; problem solving; and communication skills involving safer sex scenarios. Comparison group received one session of AIDS information routinely provided by the clinic. The skill-building intervention group showed statistically significant higher use of condoms than those in the control group at follow-up. Participants also more comfortable taking and carrying condoms, talking about safer sex with partners, had more favorable attitudes toward condoms. No drug use differences between groups.
Comment: Initial follow-up was 2-week post.
Harris, R., Kavanagh. S., Bausell, H. (1998) An intervention for changing high-risk HIV behaviors of African-American, drug dependent women.  12th World AIDS Conference, Geneva 1998 [Abstract No. 13402].
Subpopulation Researched Intervention Design Evaluated Outcome

POC/Women (African-Am)

 

204 methadone-dependent, African-American women randomized into experimental and control groups.  Experimental group participated in peer counseling and leadership training program over an 8-week period, followed by 8 weeks of reinforcement.  Program designed to reduced sexual risk behavior, increase self-esteem, decrease depressive affect, and increase AIDS knowledge. Compared to controls, experimental group reported significant increase in numbers of safer sexual behaviors, showed decreases in depression, and reported engaging in more AIDS-related, community-based communication activities.
Community-Level - IDU                                                                  Back to Top
Jamner MS, Wolitski RJ et al. (1997) Impact of a Longitudinal Community HIV Intervention Targeting Injecting Drug Users Stage of Change for Condom and Bleach Use. American Journal of Health Promotion 12(1): 15-24.
Subpopulation Researched Intervention Design Evaluated Outcome
General AIDS Community Demonstration Project in Long Beach California. 3081 IDU who were sexually active in the past 30 days or who had shared injection equipment in the past 60 days. Peer volunteers distributed fliers featuring role-model stories targeted to the population’s stage of change. Fliers were packaged with bleach kits, condoms, or both. The intervention was designed to influence behavior through the dissemination of information, the development of behavioral skills and the positive reinforcement of progress toward the consistent use of condoms and bleach. (Transtheoretical model of behavior change) Repeated cross-sectional sampling with matched intervention and comparison communities. Compared with injecting drug users in the comparison area, IDUs in the intervention area showed a significant increase in condom use with non-main partners. Subjects with recent project exposure had higher stage-of-change scores for using condoms with main and other partners and for cleaning injection equipment with bleach.
Rietmeijer CA, Kane MS et al. (1996) Increasing the Use of Bleach and Condoms Among Injecting Drug Users in Denver: Outcomes of a Targeted, Community-level HIV Prevention Program. AIDS 10(3): 291-298.
Subpopulation Researched Intervention Design Evaluated Outcome
General The AIDS Community Demonstration Project was conducted in Denver (890 participants) and the comparison site was Long Beach (1107 participants).  Of the total IDUs interviewed (N=1997), in Denver 89% were male, 31% Hispanic, and 34% black.  In Long Beach, 75% were male, 21% Hispanic, and 51% black.  Over a 2.5-year period, volunteers discussed and distributed intervention kits with small-media behavior intervention materials, role model stories, bleach kits and condoms to the 890 high-risk IDUs in Denver on a monthly basis.  Workers received training on basic HIV/AIDS education, role-playing interactions, methods of street approach and non-threatening conversation, and methods of dealing with individuals who refuse materials Proportion reporting consistent bleach use to clean needles increased significantly from baseline (20%) to early (16%) to full implementation (29%) in the intervention city; but decreased from 22% at baseline to 12% at early and full implementation in the comparison city.  Condom use during vaginal intercourse with occasional partner increased significantly from 2% at baseline to 7% at early implementation and to 24% at full implementation of the invention city and decreased from 12% to 10% in comparison city.  No change on condom use with steady partner.
Street and Community Outreach - IDU                                           Back to Top
Coyle SL, Needle RH et al. (1998) Outreach-Based HIV Prevention for Injecting Drug Users: A Review of Published Outreach Data. Public Health Report 113(1): 19-30.
Subpopulation Researched Intervention Design Evaluated Outcome
General Review of 36 published studies of outreach-based HIV risk reduction interventions for out-of-tx IDUs. Reports intervention effect on HIV related behaviors or HIV seroincidence. Most from National AIDS Demonstration Research (NADR) or Cooperative Agreement for AIDS Community-based Outreach/Intervention Research Program—both models used a standard outreach with C&T and enhanced outreach with follow-up of counseling, role-playing, etc.). 2/3 of interventions were street-based outreach followed by office-based HIV C&T. Most results are pre-post, no controls. Consistency of results across studies. IDUs regularly reported follow-up reductions in 5 major risk behaviors: stopping injecting, reducing frequency of injecting, reducing reuse of syringes, reducing reuse of other equipment, reducing crack use. Studies also show significant effects in 3 protective behaviors: more frequent needle disinfecting, entry into drug tx, and increases in condom use.
Latkin CA (1998) Outreach in natural settings: the use of peer leaders for HIV prevention among injecting drug users’ networks. Public Health Report 113 (Suppl 1): 151-9.
Subpopulation Researched Intervention Design Evaluated Outcome
POC (African-Am) Baltimore, Maryland. 36 peer leaders trained to promote prevention among contacts within and beyond sex and drug networks. Peer leaders participated in 10-session training groups were administered pretest and post-test surveys. Survey data also collected from 78 of the leaders’ risk network members.
Peer leaders had 2165 HIV prevention interactions, of which 84% were with active drug users.
Peer leaders reported a significant increase in condom use and cleaning used needles with bleach. The leaders’ risk network members, compared with controls, were significantly more likely to report greater needle hygiene.
NADR Program (National AIDS Demonstration Research) and CA Program (Cooperative Agreement for HIV/AIDS Community-based Outreach/Intervention Research).   National Institute of Drug Abuse (Adobe Acrobat, 107 pages)  An alternative format of this publication is also available upon request.
Subpopulation Researched Intervention Design Evaluated Outcome
Out-of-treatment injection drug users and the non-injecting female sex partners of male IDUs NADR: large study carried out from 1987 to 1991 in 29 sites across the US. Used indigenous outreach workers to initiate risk-reduction activities on the streets and in other settings where IDUs tend to congregate. Basic risk-reduction activities usually involved face-to-face communication; the provision of literature on HIV/AIDS transmission, prevention, and treatment; and the distribution of risk reduction materials. Outreach workers also referred drug users to services, including drug treatment services as well as HIV/AIDS treatment. Outreach was generally followed with additional, structured activities, such as confidential HIV testing and counseling and individual risk assessments.

CA: implemented in 23 U.S. sites from 1990 to 1999. Used elements of the NADR program plus clients assigned to basic or "enhanced" intervention services, with basic services held consistent across sites. Outreach activities were similar to those in the NADR program, but were defined more uniformly. The basic intervention entailed community-based outreach as a prelude to two education and counseling sessions, organized around optional HIV testing and counseling to help drug users learn about their serostatus and the behavior changes needed to reduce transmission risks.

Study findings indicate that the outreach-based interventions designed and tested in the NADR and CA programs were effective in reaching at-risk individuals and enabling them to reduce risk behaviors and, consequently, their risk of acquiring HIV/AIDS. Community-based outreach was found to be an effective approach for reaching out-of-treatment drug users, providing materials to support HIV risk reduction, facilitating drug treatment entry and retention, providing referrals for HIV testing and counseling, and promoting HIV risk reduction. The consistency of results is evidence that a strategy of community-based outreach, counseling, and education interventions promoted beneficial drug- and sex-risk behavior changes.
Siegal HA, Falck RS et al. (1995) Reducing HIV Needle Risk Behaviors Among Injection-Drug Users in the Midwest: An Evaluation of the Efficacy of Standard and Enhanced Interventions. AIDS Education and Prevention 7(4): 308-319.
Subpopulation Researched Intervention Design Evaluated Outcome
POC (African Am) NADR site. 907 participants (74% male, 75% African-Am) assigned to one of two types of standard or enhanced intervention. Standard: a one-hour session (in the field office) which the counselor-educator provided details on HIV disease and modes of transmission and an instructional session which was followed by a videotape of role plays illustrating proper condom use and needle cleaning. Bleach and condoms provided. Enhanced: added to the standard intervention three one-to two-hour sessions on the pathology of HIV disease, drug addiction and safer sex. These were delivered over a one-month period in-group sessions of 3-5 people. All participants received voluntary and confidential HIV counseling/testing as well as knowledge of negative results. Follow-ups 5 to 9 months after baseline. Both interventions appeared to improve needle practices. The enhanced intervention showed more effectiveness in helping those with unsafe practices to become more safe, but did not appear to be more effective at helping those practicing safer needle practices maintain those practices. In multivariate analysis, subjects in enhanced more likely to change from unsafe to safe needle use. Regardless of intervention track, daily injectors less likely to adopt safer injecting practices than weekly or occasional injectors.
Wiebel WW, Jimenez A, Johnson W et al. (1996) Risk behavior and HIV seroincidence among out-of-treatment injection drug users: A four-year prospective study. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes and Human Retrovirology 12: 282-289.
Subpopulation Researched Intervention Design Evaluated Outcome
POC NADR site. Monitored trends in HIV risk behaviors and seroconversion among out-of-treatment IDUs receiving street-based outreach in Chicago. Began 1988, followed 641 HIV negative IDUs for 4 years. Intervention guided by Indigenous Leader Outreach Model. Ex-addicts delivered HIV prevention services targeting IDU social networks in community settings. Collected baseline and 6 waves of follow-up interview data. Subjects came from 3 low-income neighborhoods: African-Am, ethnically mixed, and Puerto Rican. Observed HIV incidence decreased, from 8.4 to 2.4 per 100 person-years. Prevalence of drug risk behaviors (sharing needles or equipment without disinfecting) decreased, from 100% to 14%. Sex risk behavior (multiple partners, sex with an IDU, or not always using condoms) decreased, from 71% to 45%.
Intervention Combination - IDU                                                     Back to Top
Kipke MD, Edgington R et al. (1998) HIV Prevention for Adolescent IDUs at a storefront needle exchange program in Hollywood, CA. Presented at the 12 The World AIDS Conference, Geneva Switzerland. Abstract #23204.
Subpopulation Researched Intervention Design Evaluated Outcome
Youth (24 and under) Needle exchange targeting young IDUs, which contains, art programming, peer-support groups, HIV testing and case management (largest youth NEP in the US). Over 70% of clients reported no needle sharing in the last 30 days, and young people who used the NEP on a regular basis were less likely to share needles.
Nyamathi AM, Flaskenis J et al. (1994) Evaluation of Two AIDS Education Programs for Impoverished Latina Women. AIDS Education and Prevention 6(4): 296-309.
Subpopulation Researched Intervention Design Evaluated Outcome
POC Women drug using/homeless The purpose was to evaluate and contrast the effectiveness of two culturally sensitive AIDS education programs.  131 women participated in the traditional program where they received one hour of AIDS education and community resource information.  82 women participated in a specialized program where the information was extended to include reinforcement of risk skills and enhancement of self-esteem and control Over the two-week interval, significant improvements were found in both groups for all cognitive and psychological variables, except problem-focused coping.  High-risk IV drug use (in those who reported this behavior during the pre test) decreased from 18 to 7 in the traditional group and from 14 to 0 in the specialized group.  Likewise, reports of non-IV drug use and sexual activity with multiple partners decreased in both groups.
Concern: Very short follow-up.
Powers B, Penn S et al. (1990) AIDS Risk Reduction Among Female IVDUs and female sexual partners of IVDUs, 1988-1989. VI International Conference on AIDS 6, 421.
Subpopulation Researched Intervention Design Evaluated Outcome
Women Female IDU and female sex partners of IDUs contacted via street outreach were reached individually (4, 724) or in groups (7,829). The intervention was to study the ‘early’ and ‘late’ outreach efforts compared to reports of participants in ‘safer sex workshops.’ Other outreach efforts included provision of condoms and needles, referrals, group and individual counseling and client advocacy.v In early workshops, 15% reported regularly or always using condoms; in later workshops, this increased to 50% (no statistical analysis).
Tross S, Abdul-Quader AS et al. (1993) Evaluation of a Peer Outreach HIV Prevention Program for Female Partners of Injecting Drug users (IDUs) in New York City. IX International Conference on AIDS 9,840.
Subpopulation Researched Intervention Design Evaluated Outcome
Women 658 Female sex partners of IDU residing in a high use housing project. Peer outreach/media distribution of flyers containing risk reduction strategies of actual peer models occurring in 2 randomly selected housing projects. Two non-intervention housing projects provided a comparison sample. At follow-up, there was no change in condoms use or intention to use condoms in the comparison sample, while the intervention sample showed increased percentage always using condoms (18% to 30%) and decrease percentage never using condoms (46% to 27%).
HIV Antibody Counseling & Testing - IDU                                     Back to Top
Casadonte P, Des Jarlais D. (1990) Psychological and Behavioral Impact among Intravenous Drug Users of learning HIV test results. The International Journal of Addiction 25(4): 4 09-426.
Subpopulation Researched Intervention Design Evaluated Outcome
POC 81 drug users tested and informed of HIV positive results. Giving positive test results were associated in decrease in sex (60%) at a 10 week follow up and more condom and less drug use
Higgins DL, C Galavotti et al. (1991) Evidence for the Effects of HIV Antibody Counseling and Testing on Risk Behaviors. Journal of American Medical Association 266(17): 2419-2429.
Subpopulation Researched Intervention Design Evaluated Outcome
  A review of 12 studies on the effects of C/T on behavior change (needle use, cleaning of needles and condoms use) of injection drug users (actual study reviews several populations). From the 12 studies the results were: 50% of the studies showed some increase in needle hygiene; 42% showed decrease in needle or drug use; 25% showed increase in condom usage and, 17% showed decrease sexual partners.
Neaigua A, Sufian M et al. (1990) Effects of Outreach intervention on risk reduction among IDU. AIDS Education and Prevention 2(4): 253-271.
Subpopulation Researched Intervention Design Evaluated Outcome
POC 276 IDU were reached by street educators who were ex-addicts, provided easy referral for HIV testing. No control group. 4.5-month follow-up. Drug use in last 30 days decreased, times injected decreased; 84% tested – half not return for results.
Higginbotham, S., Holmes, R., Stone, H., Beil, J., Datu, Costa, S., G.B., Paul, S., (2000) Adoption of Protective Behaviors Among Persons With Recent HIV Infection and Diagnosis--- Alabama, New Jersey, and Tennessee, 1997--1998. MMWR June 16, 2000/49(23); 512-515
Subpopulation Researched Intervention Design Evaluated Outcome
  To examine risk behaviors (e.g., condom use and number of sex partners) after HIV diagnosis, CDC analyzed data on HIV Testing history and sexual behavior of persons who may have recently acquired HIV infection as part of a CDC sponsored study in Alabama, New Jersey, and Tennessee.  For purpose of the study, criteria for recent HIV infection included persons with diagnosed and reported HIV infection with CD4 T-lymphocyte counts >700 cells/ul or percentage>36, documented HIV seroconversion within 18 months of confirmed HIV infection diagnosis, or persons aged 13-24 years when diagnosed.  During January 1997 through September 1998, 615 persons with HIV infection diagnosed and reported met the criteria for the study.  These persons represented 15% of all persons reported with HIV in the three states.  Prior to diagnosis, the females reporting having vaginal sex with males and males reporting anal sex with males 25% reported never using a condom, 69% reported sometimes using a condom, and 6% reported always using condoms Of the 543 persons eligible after follow-up, 180 persons completed the interview within 12 months of the self-reported date learning they were HIV infected (median: 6 months).  Among those, 99 (55%) were female; 96 (53%) were <25 years old; and 105 were non-Hispanic blacks, 49 were non-Hispanic white, 24 were Hispanic, and two self reported as “other”.  162 (90%) responded that they had changed their behavior since learning of their HIV infection.  After diagnosis, the females reporting having vaginal sex with males and males reporting anal sex with males, 30% reported not having sex, 6% reported never using a condom, 11% reported sometimes using a condom, and 47% reported always using condoms.  The number of sexual partners for the males and females decreased as well.
Further information can be found in The Revised Guidelines for HIV Counseling, Testing, and Referral (Adobe Acrobat, 110 pages) published by the CDC.  An alternative format of this publication is also available upon request.
Partner Notification - IDU                                                                Back to Top
Giesecke J, Ramstedt K, Granath F, Ripa T, Rado G, Westrell M (1991). Efficacy of partner notification for HIV infection. Lancet 338(8775): 1096-1100.
Subpopulation Researched Intervention Design Evaluated Outcome
IDU Stockholm, 1989-1990. 365 infected patients (91% of those diagnosed in Sweden during the interval) named 564 needle-sharing or sexual partners. 390 located, 350 with known test results. 50 new seropositives identified.
Levy JA, Fox SE (1998) The Outreach-assisted Model of Partner Notification with IDUs. Public Health Report 113(S-1): 160-9.
Subpopulation Researched Intervention Design Evaluated Outcome
General Chicago. 386 IDU participated. 63 (16%) tested HIV positive; 60 post-test counseled. Randomized to "self-tell" vs. "enhanced" groups. In "self-tell" group marginal locating information given for at least 142 (50% injecting, 25% sex, 25% both). 82% of IDU in the "enhanced" group wanted the outreach worker to do the partner notification, and 70% of partners notified were done by outreach staff. IDUs wanted assistance in partner notification and were cooperative.
Partner Counseling and Referral Services to Identified Persons with Undiagnosed HIV---North Carolina.  MMWR December 5, 2003/52 (48); 1181-1184
Subpopulation Researched Intervention Design Evaluated Outcome
  In 1989, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services began offering PCRS to clients who tested positive in confidential and anonymous testing venues.  HIV infection became reportable in 1990 and anonymous testing was discontinued in 1997.  A trained disease intervention specialist (DIS) completed six important steps.  All notified partners received risk reduction counseling and appropriate referrals. Data collected from 2001 revealed a total of 1,603 persons were newly reported to have HIV infections.  DIS were assigned to conduct PCRS with 1,580 (99%) index clients, 1,378 (87%) were located and PCRS identified 1,532 sex or needle sharing partners.  1,359 partners were located and notified of their possible exposure to HIV.  After PCRS, from those who not previously testing positive for HIV, 108 newly tested partners were diagnosed HIV positive.

CDC Technical Guidance for Partner Notification and Referral Services

Procedural Guidance for Implementation of Partner Notification and Referral Services (Adobe Acrobat, 33 pages)  An alternative format of this publication is also available upon request.

No reviews on Mass & Other Media, Social Marketing, Hotlines, and Clearinghouse for HIV Positive Persons.

 

 
No reviews on Mass & Other Media, Social Marketing, Hotlines, and Clearinghouse for IDU
 

DOH Home | Access Washington | Privacy Notice | Disclaimer/Copyright Information

Washington State Department of Health
HIV Prevention & Education Services
P.O. Box 47840
Olympia, Washington, 98504-7840


Send inquires about DOH and its programs to the Health Consumer Assistance Office
Comments or questions regarding this web site? Send mail to the SubSite Developer.

Documents posted in .pdf version on the Department of Health Web site will be made available in an alternative format on request to users who are unable to download or view .pdf files on the Web. To request an alternative format, contact: Beth Watkins.

Last Update: 06/24/2008