|
|
| You are here: DOH Home » EH » EHST » Pesticide Illness » About the Program | Search | Employees |
|
Site Directory |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
• Contacts Learn more about • Office of Environmental Health, Safety, and Toxicology • Other Environmental Health Programs & Services
|
About the Pesticide Program |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Protecting People From Pesticide Illness The Pesticide Illness Monitoring and Prevention Program investigates about 300 pesticide-related illness cases annually. The Pesticide Program is mandated through Chapter 70.104 RCW and pesticide-related illnesses are required to be reported by WAC 246-101-101. The information we collect is used to design illness prevention messages and strategies that include national efforts to change labels and practices, or remove unsafe products from the marketplace. Recent Success Using evidence from our summary of fogger-related illnesses and recommendations (PDF 96KB), the EPA is requiring label changes to total release foggers (bug bombs). The new labels will provide pictograms to illustrate proper use and will contain improved and clearly stated health and safety information. Resources We Provide
About Our Investigations
What We Collect The typical case investigation involves interviewing symptomatic people and witnesses, reviewing relevant medical records and lab test results, and obtaining pesticide spray records or interviewing the applicator to confirm the pesticide product involved. Interviews may be conducted by phone or at the patient's home or work site. We don't have a lab for processing environmental samples, but will review the results of sampling conducted by other agencies, who may also be involved in the case. Suspected violations may be referred to Department of Agriculture or the Department of Labor and Industries. Classification of Cases We use a standard protocol, developed by the National Institutes of Occupational Safety and Health, for classifying cases as to the likelihood that the symptoms reported are related to a pesticide exposure. All cases we investigate are internally reviewed to assure high quality and standard coding of pesticide illness cases. The chart below provides a basic description of the case classification criteria for acute pesticide-related illness and injury.
Data Analysis Information collected during case investigations is entered into the Pesticide Illness Monitoring System (PIMS) database. PIMS is searchable by variables such as county, target crop, site of exposure, pesticide type, pesticide active ingredient, and demographic information. Analysis on PIMS data is conducted and published in pesticide-illness related reports. Because the database contains personal identifiers and medical information, it is not open to public viewing. Contact our program for data inquiries. Limitations of the Data We only investigate acute illnesses and injuries. We don't investigate chronic or latent effects of pesticides. These types of effects include cancer, birth defects, developmental abnormalities, and neurological disease. There are several regional research institutions that are actively studying these types of effects. Not all cases of pesticide illness are reported to us. The case may not be reported if the sick person does not seek health care, if the person seeks health care but the health care provider fails to recognize it as pesticide-related illness, or if the health care provider does not report the case as required. A study also found that farm workers are unlikely to seek health care for mild or moderately severe illnesses they thought were caused by pesticides because of the cost of time away from work and the cost of medical care. For more information on this study, see Improving Data Quality in Pesticide Illness Surveillance (PDF 4.6MB). Information on reported cases may be insufficient to document the case. We may not be able to locate a seasonal worker for our interview. We may not be able to determine where pesticide spray drift originated. We may not be able to identify a pesticide product. Such cases are entered into the PIMS database but are not included in most analyses of data. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|