|
Other links
concerning Notifiable Conditions |
|
|
|
Posters |
|
|
|
Associated Programs |
|
|

|
|
|
Surveillance and Reporting Guidelines for
Hantavirus Pulmonary Syndrome
(HPS)
|
back to
HPS index page |
|
Disease
Reporting |
|
In Washington |
New requirements
for the reporting of hantavirus pulmonary syndrome (HPS) were
instituted in December of 2000. Since its recognition in 1993,
there have been 23 reported cases of HPS in Washington through
June 2002 with 8 associated deaths.
Deer mice are the primary
reservoir for hantavirus in Washington State; exposure to their
nests, urine, feces or saliva places individuals at risk for
developing infection. Hantavirus is not transmitted from person
to person. |
|
Purpose of Reporting and
Surveillance |
- To identify rodent sources of infection.
- To design more effective control or prevention methods.
- To better characterize the epidemiology of this organism.
|
|
Reporting Requirements |
- Health care providers: notifiable to Local Health
Jurisdiction within 3 work days
- Hospitals: notifiable to Local Health Jurisdiction within
3 work days
- Laboratories: no requirements for reporting
- Local health jurisdictions: notifiable to DOH Communicable
Disease Epidemiology within 7 days of case investigation
completion or summary information required within 21 days
|
|
|
Case Definition for Surveillance |
|
Clinical Criteria for Diagnosis |
An illness
characterized by one or more of the following clinical features:
- A febrile illness (i.e., temperature greater than 101° F
[greater than 38.3° C]) characterized by bilateral diffuse
interstitial edema that may radiographically resemble ARDS,
with respiratory compromise requiring supplemental oxygen,
developing within 72 hours of hospitalization, and occurring
in a previously healthy person.
- An unexplained respiratory illness resulting in death,
with an autopsy examination demonstrating noncardiogenic
pulmonary edema without an identifiable cause.
|
|
Laboratory Criteria for Diagnosis |
- Detection of hantavirus-specific immunoglobulin M or
rising titers of hantavirus-specific immunoglobulin G, or
- Detection of hantavirus-specific ribonucleic acid
sequence by polymerase chain reaction in clinical specimens,
or
- Detection of hantavirus antigen by immunohistochemistry.
Laboratory testing should
be performed or confirmed at a reference laboratory. Because
the clinical illness is nonspecific and ARDS is common, a
screening case definition can be used to determine which
patients to test. In general, a predisposing medical
condition (e.g., chronic pulmonary disease, malignancy,
trauma, burn, and surgery) is a more likely cause of ARDS
than HPS, and patients who have these underlying conditions
and ARDS need not be tested for hantavirus.
|
|
Case Definition |
- Confirmed: a clinically compatible case that is
laboratory confirmed.
|
|
|
A. Description |
|
1. Identification |
An acute
zoonotic viral disease characterized by fever, myalgias and GI
complaints followed by the abrupt onset of respiratory distress
and hypotension. The illness progresses rapidly to severe
respiratory failure and shock. An elevated hematocrit,
hypoalbuminemia and thrombocytopenia are found in most cases.
The crude mortality rate is approximately 40%-50%; it was 43% of
the first 217 cases identified. In survivors, the recovery from
acute illness is rapid, but full convalescence may require weeks
to months. Restoration of normal lung function generally occurs,
but pulmonary function abnormalities may persist in some
individuals. Renal and hemorrhagic manifestations are usually
conspicuously absent except in some severe cases.
Diagnosis is made by the
demonstration of specific immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies by
using ELISA, Western blot or strip immunoblot techniques. Most
patients have IgM antibodies at the time of hospitalization. PCR
analysis of autopsy or biopsy tissues and immunohistochemistry
are also established diagnostic techniques in specialized
laboratories. |
|
2. Infectious Agent |
Multiple hantaviruses have been
identified in the Americas: Sin Nombre virus is the agent
responsible for the 1993 epidemic in southwest US and most of
the other cases identified in North America. Other strains
associated with human disease include Black Creek Canal and
Bayou viruses (southeastern US), New York-1 and Monongahela
viruses (eastern US), Andes virus (Argentina, Chile), Laguna
Negra virus (Paraguay, Bolivia) and Juquitiba virus (Brazil). |
|
3. Worldwide Occurrence |
The disease was first recognized
in the spring and summer of 1993 in the Four Corners area of New
Mexico and Arizona, principally among resident Native American
populations. Since then, cases have been confirmed in many
western states and Canada. Sporadic cases have occurred in
eastern regions of the US. Sporadic cases and several outbreaks
have been reported in South American countries (e.g., Argentina,
Bolivia, Paraguay, Chile, Brazil). The disease is not restricted
to any ethnic group. Incidence appears to coincide with the
geographic distribution, population density and proportion of
carrier rodents that are infected. |
|
4. Reservoir |
The major reservoir of Sin
Nombre virus appears to be the deer mouse, Peromyscus
maniculatus. Antibodies have also been found in other
Peromyscus species, pack rats, the chipmunk and other
rodents. Other hantavirus strains identified thus far have been
associated predominantly with other sigmodontine rodent species. |
|
5. Modes of Transmission |
As with hantavirus caused
hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome, aerosol transmission from
rodent excreta is presumed. The natural history of viral
infections of host rodents has not been characterized. Indoor
exposures in closed, poorly ventilated homes, vehicles and
outbuildings with visible rodent infestation are especially
prominent. |
|
6. Incubation Period |
Has not been completely defined
but is thought to be approximately 2 weeks with a possible range
of a few days to 6 weeks. |
|
7. Period of Communicability |
Person to person spread of
hantaviruses in the US has not occurred. However, person to
person transmission has been reported during an outbreak in
Argentina. |
|
8. Susceptibility and Resistance |
All persons without prior
infection are presumed to be susceptible. No inapparent
infections have been documented to date, but milder infections
without frank pulmonary edema have been seen. No second cases
have been identified, but the protection and duration of
immunity conferred by previous infection is unknown. |
|
|
B. Methods of Control |
|
1. Preventive Measures |
- Exclude and prevent rodent access to houses and other
buildings.
- Store human and animal food under rodent proof
conditions.
- Disinfect rodent contaminated areas by spraying a
disinfectant (such as dilute bleach) solution prior to
cleaning. Do not sweep or vacuum rat contaminated areas;
use a wet mop or towels moistened with disinfectant. Avoid
inhalation of dust by using approved respirators when
cleaning previously unoccupied areas.
- Trap and dispose of rodents using suitable precautions.
Live trapping is not recommended.
- In enzootic areas, minimize exposure to wild rodents and
their excreta.
- Laboratory rodent colonies, particularly Rattus
norvegicus, should be tested to ensure freedom from
asymptomatic hantavirus infection.
|
|
2. Control of Patient, Contacts
and the Immediate Environment |
- Report to local health authority.
- Isolation: None.
- Concurrent disinfection: None.
- Quarantine: None.
- Immunization of contacts: None.
- Investigation of contacts and source of infection:
Exterminate rodents in and around the households if feasible.
- Specific treatment: Provide respiratory intensive care
management, carefully avoid overhydration that might lead to
exacerbation of pulmonary edema. Use cardiotonic drugs and
pressors early under careful monitoring to prevent shock.
Strictly avoid hypoxia, particularly if transfer is
contemplated. Ribavirin is investigational and of no proven
benefit. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has been used
with some success.
|
|
3. Epidemic Measures |
Public education regarding
rodent avoidance and rodent control in homes is desirable in
endemic situations and should be intensified during epidemics.
Monitoring of rodent numbers and infection rates is desirable
but as yet of unproven value. Rodent control; surveillance for
hantavirus infections in wild rodents. Laboratory associated
outbreaks call for evaluation of the associated rodents and, if
positive, elimination of the rodents and thorough disinfection. |
|
4. International Measures |
Control transport of exotic
reservoir rodents. |
|
|