|
Interim Progress Report - Budget Period Three
Critical Capacity:
Provide health/risk information to the public
and key partners during a terrorism event.
Workplan - Budget Period Four
Critical Capacity 15: Provide health/risk information
to the public and key partners during a terrorism event
1. Complete a plan for crisis and emergency risk
communication and information dissemination
2. Conduct drills, exercises, and training related
to emergency channels of communication
3. Complete a plan for activities that will meet
the specific needs of special populations
4. Assess public information needs and identify
communication resources needed for the public distribution of supplies
through the National Pharmaceutical Stockpile program
5. Coordinate risk communication planning with key
state and local government and non-government emergency response
partners
6. Establish capabilities to provide "hotline"
services when needed, including those that provide mental health
services
7. Train key state & local public health
spokespersons in crisis and emergency risk communication principles
and standards
8. Enumerate participants in a public information
system that can be activated to address communications and information
dissemination issues regarding smallpox
9. Develop local communications materials
regarding smallpox training and education
10. Consider joining a public information and
crisis communication working group to address cross border cooperation
11. Establish mechanisms to translate emergency
messages into priority languages spoken within the jurisdiction
12. Test responsiveness of participants within the
public information system to address communications and information
dissemination issues regarding smallpox
13. Complete the CDC Emergency Risk Communication
train-the-trainer program.
.
Budget Period Three Progress Report
Using the Interim Progress Report template below, provide a brief
status report that describes progress made toward achievement of each
of the critical capacities and critical benchmarks
outlined in the continuation guidance issued by CDC in February 2002.
Applicants should describe their agency’s overall success in achieving
each critical capacity. The progress report narratives should not
exceed 1 page, single-spaced, for each critical capacity. Applicants
are welcome to use bullet-point format in their answers, so long as
the information is clearly conveyed in the response.
CRITICAL CAPACITY: To provide needed health/risk information to
the public and key partners during a terrorism event by
establishing critical baseline information about the current
communication needs and barriers within individual communities, and
identifying effective channels of communication for reaching the
general public and special populations during public health threats
and emergencies.
Provide an update on progress during Project Year III toward
achieving this critical capacity:
|
During the past year, the Washington State Department of Health
(DOH) undertook several key initiatives to achieve this critical
capacity including completion of a risk communication plan
developed to provide public health information to the media and
general public, as well as support and message coordination to
Local Health Jurisdictions (LHJs) and emergency system partners
(including hospitals) in the event of a public health emergency.
Plan elements include an emergency phone bank to assist LHJs and
the media, emergency Web procedures, media procedures, and
emergency information dissemination and notification protocols.
The plan is complete, and many portions have been tested and
enhanced through events and exercises this year (including
smallpox immunizations, SARS, West Nile virus, and local
participation in TOP-OFF).
Initiatives include:
- Needs Assessment – Communication capacity
assessments were completed with all LHJs and hospitals in 2002, and
have been used to establish critical baseline information concerning
current communication needs and barriers.
- Strategies – Communication plans—based on our
primary DOH Communication Office Risk Communication Strategy—have
been effectively developed and activated to address a variety of
emerging issues including: Stage 1 Smallpox Immunizations, West Nile
Virus, and TOP-OFF exercises. Emergency strategies have been shared
with LHJs through a variety of means including: Smallpox
Immunization—Risk Communication Training, updates in our Public
Health Emergency Planning and Response (PHEPR) e-newsletter, and
regular communication with LHJ public information offices. In the
next few months, we will provide additional assistance in emergency
communication plan development to LHJs, as needed, using the DOH
model and the CDC’s City and County Crisis Communication Planning
Worksheet and Toolkit.
- Training – Risk communication training has been
conducted for a variety of internal and external groups, and
regional trainings are planned for LHJs and other system partners in
July, 2003. DOH offers two training models on risk communication:
Risk Communication in Public Health (based on the CDCynergy
model and targeting people who do not necessarily work with the
media), and DOH Media and Risk Communication Training
(emphasizing media strategy development). Combined versions of these
courses are available (developed for Smallpox Immunization trainings
this year).
- Local Support – We created a new statewide
resource to support local emergency communication initiatives and
provide a comprehensive approach to planning through the Regional
Emergency Communications Liaison Network (see Attachment
1—Regional Emergency Communications Network). The DOH
Communications Office enhanced its capacity to provide risk
communication, media and message development support to LHJs and
other system partners.
- General Public Hotline – DOH created the
capacity to activate an emergency general public phone bank. The
agency maintains a roster of volunteers from throughout DOH. We also
created emergency recorded information lines. Additionally, we
promoted the CDC’s general public hotline services, and participated
in several meetings regarding 211 and related initiatives.
- Information Development and Dissemination – We
worked with all Focus Areas—and related DOH programs—to create fact
sheets, presentations, talking points, Q&As and media resources on
emerging issues. We created Web-based libraries of emergency
information for the general public and system partners (including
PHEPR, Smallpox, SARS and Notifiable Conditions Web sites,
and an internal PHEPR Web site). We also supported the Public Health
Improvement Partnership’s initiative to create communication tools
and resources for the public health system—including a Web site of
related information and templates. Other tools include: a monthly
PHEPR e-newsletter for system partners, and a comprehensive
emergency preparedness glossary for public health. Information
dissemination channels have been developed and tested through
partnerships with the Washington State Hospital Association, LHJ
Public Information Offices, Washington State Association of Local
Public Health Officers, Office of the Superintendent of Public
Instruction, Washington State Emergency Management Division (EMD),
and other entities. DOH and EMD have also formed a partnership to
co-develop emergency preparedness and response educational resources
for the general public.
- Special Populations – A number of connections
have been made this year to enhance outreach and response to special
populations including—but not limited to—non-English speaking
communities, children and families, the elderly, people with
disabilities, and minority communities. This year, we began work on
a Community and Agency Partner Matrix to more effectively develop
outreach and feedback mechanisms in these communities. Many fact
sheets have already been created in response to requests from Matrix
partners, and translations of key materials are planned throughout
the coming months into top six priority languages (as identified
through work with the Washington State Department of Social and
Health Services). Cultural competency and special population issues
are incorporated in our planning and training efforts.
|
Critical Benchmark #13: What is the status of your risk
communication plan?
DOH response:
The plan is completed (100% completed)
Back to top
Budget Year Four Workplan
For each Recipient Activity applicants should complete the work plan
templates attached below. Applicants are welcome to use bullet-point
format in their answers, so long as the information is clearly conveyed in
the response. All responses should be brief and concise. Please note
that full use of the CDC templates will meet all of the requirements for
submission of a progress report and work plan. Although no additional
information is required, grantees may elect to submit other essential
supporting documents via the web portal by uploading them as additional
electronic files.
CRITICAL CAPACITY #15: to provide needed health/risk information to
the public and key partners during a terrorism event by
establishing critical baseline information about the current communication
needs and barriers within individual communities, and identifying
effective channels of communication for reaching the general public and
special populations during public health threats and emergencies.
Recipient Activities:
1. Complete a plan for crisis and emergency risk communication (CERC)
and information dissemination to educate the media, public, partners
and stakeholders regarding risks associated with the real or apparent
threat and an effective public response. (CRITICAL BENCHMARK #23)
Strategies: What overarching approach(es) will be used to undertake
this activity?
| The public health system in Washington
State includes the Washington State Department of Health (DOH), 35
Local Health Jurisdictions (LHJs) representing all 39 counties,
private and public partners (such as health care providers, hospitals
and other health care facilities), related local, county, state,
federal and tribal government agencies, and other community partners.
Effective crisis and risk communication planning and information
dissemination efforts will rely on developing a unified approach,
maximizing existing resources, and building on established
communication channels and partnerships. In 2002-2003, DOH completed
assessments of existing communication capabilities in Washington
hospitals and LHJs. Key findings include:
- Although some LHJs have the capacity to develop their
own materials, many rely on DOH to provide fact sheets, talking
points and other materials on critical biological and chemical
agents and other emergency preparedness topics.
- A small number of LHJs have written emergency
communication plans specific to the health department; the
majority are part of larger county plans.
- All LHJs have designated spokespeople but only a few
have dedicated public information officer staff; others rely on
county staff or on LHJ employees who have other primary duties.
Most LHJs without public information staff would also seek support
from DOH in an emergency.
- Both LHJs and hospitals identified risk communication
training as a primary need.
- Large and mid-sized hospitals generally have fully
dedicated public information or communication staff, but would
like to continue to build on partnerships with public health to
ensure consistency of related emergency messages. Small rural
hospitals usually do not have fully dedicated communications staff
and will rely on the Washington State Hospital Association (WSHA)
and DOH for help. (WSHA has an established network of public
information and communication staff, and has given DOH full access
to the network.)
Based on these and other assessment results and ongoing feedback
from LHJs, the Washington State Hospital Association (WSHA), and other
stakeholders and system partners (including staff in Focus Area A),
DOH will use a multi-tiered strategy to ensure effective emergency
communication planning and information dissemination efforts:
1. DOH Agency Strategy – Seamlessly integrate public
information and communication priorities in the DOH Comprehensive
Emergency Management Plan (with Focus Area A). With Focus Area A,
continue to partner in stakeholder and emergency system outreach
efforts to promote system-wide understanding of risk communication
issues and strategies.
2. Partnerships (General Public and Special Populations) -
Continue to build partnerships with stakeholder groups and related
emergency management agencies and organizations to ensure public
health messages are effectively disseminated to the general public
and special populations through a variety of channels.
3. DOH Communications Office Strategy - Continue to
enhance the DOH Communications Office Emergency Communication Plan
(implemented in 2002) to ensure both pre-event and event support and
materials are available to LHJs, hospitals and other system
partners, and that the plan continues to address evolving emergency
preparedness needs and topics related to real or apparent threats.
4. Media Education - Partner with Focus Area G, LHJs and
regional entities to establish an ongoing system of media education
opportunities and resources. (The DOH Communications Office will
build on the media education model developed for Stage 1 Smallpox
Vaccinations including forums, conference calls and Web-based
library of resources and materials.) DOH will collaborate with WSHA
to present media education opportunities through the WSHA Web
conference system, as appropriate.
5. Regional Emergency Communication Liaison Network - To
provide needed, local support and overall consistency to statewide
efforts, the Regional Emergency Communication Liaison Network has
been established (See attachment: "Regional Emergency
Communication Liaison Network"). Liaisons will assist
state staff in comprehensive statewide risk and emergency
communication planning efforts and will be a conduit of information
to local community partners.
6. Coordination with Focus Area, Local, State, Tribal and
Federal Partners – Continue to coordinate emergency public
health communication planning and resource development efforts with
Focus Area, local, state, tribal and federal partners. Focus Area F
staff will continue to create and maintain information channels to
provide ongoing information on grant-related activities to partners
and stakeholders.
7. Best Practices Approach – Communication plan
development efforts will continue to use key resources regarding
all-hazards planning including the CDC’s Crisis and Emergency
Communication planning modules, information from Federal
Emergency Management Agency’s All-Hazard Emergency Operations
Planning State and Local Guide, the Department of Health and
Human Services’ 17 Critical Benchmarks for Bioterrorism
Preparedness, and best practices from other local, state and
federal agencies.
|
Tasks: What key tasks will be conducted in carrying out each identified
strategy?
|
1. DOH Agency Strategy –
a. Focus Area F staff will continue to participate in updating
the DOH Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (with Focus Area
A) to ensure public information and communication priorities are
integrated into overall agency emergency planning efforts.
b. Focus Area F staff will assist in editing the plan and in
disseminating information about the plan to DOH staff through
internal fact sheets and an intranet site for the CEMP and other
Public Health Emergency Preparedness and Response (PHEPR)
initiatives.
c. Focus Area F will continue to partner with Focus Area A in
stakeholder and emergency system outreach efforts, and will
provide assistance in developing related presentation materials.
2. Partnerships (General Public and Special Populations) –
d. Focus Area F staff will continue to build partnerships with
stakeholder groups and related emergency management agencies and
organizations to ensure public health messages are effectively
disseminated to the general public and special populations through
a variety of channels.
e. Partnership efforts will include: American Red Cross
(Together We Prepare Initiative), Washington State Emergency
Management Division (emergency preparedness materials regarding
chemical and biological threats), Washington State Hospital
Association, Washington State Coalition for the Homeless, the
Washington State Office of the Superintendent of Public
Instruction (school administrators, teachers, nurses, students and
families), the Washington State Department of Personnel’s Employee
Advisory Program, the Governor’s Office on Indian Affairs, and
other internal and external agencies and organizations that work
with mental health issues, non-English speaking groups, the
elderly, children and families, cultural sensitivities, hearing
and sight impairment issues and other issues of concern to special
populations.
3. DOH Communications Office Strategy –
f. The DOH Communications Office will continue to enhance its
Emergency Communication Plan (implemented in 2002) to ensure both
pre-event and event support and materials are available to LHJs,
hospitals and other system partners, and that the plan continues
to address evolving emergency preparedness needs and topics
related to real or apparent threats.
g. The Communications Office will also continue training and
development with identified DOH Emergency Communications Roster
staff on crisis and risk communication to ensure preparedness in
the event of an emergency.
4. Media Education –
h. The DOH Communications Office will partner with Focus Area
G, LHJs and regional entities to establish an ongoing system of
media education opportunities and resources. Building on the media
education model developed for Stage 1 Smallpox Vaccinations,
resources will include forums on public health emergency topics,
conference call update opportunities and a Web-based library of
information and materials.
i. DOH will work with LHJs to co-host education events with
public information officers and local public health administrators
in key counties throughout the state to ensure a comprehensive
system approach while highlighting local issues and resources.
j. We will also support Web-based regional media resource
development efforts in key counties.
5. Regional Emergency Communication Liaison Network –
k. Regional Liaisons will work with related state staff to
assist LHJs in using the CDC’s Crisis Communication Planning
Worksheet and Toolkit, building community partnerships
(including hospitals and organizations serving special
populations), and developing effective statewide and local public
outreach resources.
6. Coordination with Focus Area, Local, State, Tribal and
Federal Partners –
l. To ensure consistency in emergency planning and information
dissemination efforts—and to share resources—Focus Area F and
emergency communication liaison staff will work with the CDC, LHJs,
regional administrators, emergency system partners, tribal
contacts, Focus Area and other DOH staff to build awareness,
coordinate efforts and solicit feedback regarding materials and
resource development. Focus Area F staff will continue to work
with PHEPR initiative staff to create ongoing information
resources for stakeholders and system partners including PHEPR Web
sites and monthly newsletter.
m. The Communications Office management team will continue to
participate in regular information-sharing forums with the DOH
senior management team, the Governor’s Office, the Washington
State Emergency Management Division and other key state, regional
and local partners.
7. Coordination with Hospitals –
n. With the Washington State Hospital Association, enhance
existing communication channels and establish new opportunities to
share information and coordinate emergency and risk communication
initiatives.
8. Best Practices Approach –
o. Continued review and assessment of emergency management and
planning resources.
p. Continuing participation in educational and
information-sharing opportunities with related local, state and
federal agencies.
|
Timeline: What are the critical milestones and completion dates for
each task?
|
1. Ongoing: Work with Focus Area A in updating the CEMP. Continue
to work with Focus Area A in developing materials for and outreach
opportunities to agency and emergency system partners.
2. Ongoing (updates due December 1, 2003, April 1, 2004, August
1, 2004): With Regional Emergency Communication Liaisons, develop
statewide Community and Agency Partner Matrix with an emphasis on
organizations providing expertise and communication channels for
mental health issues, services for the hearing and sight impaired,
and special populations including minority and non-English speaking
communities, homeless and transient communities, the elderly,
children and families. Develop state and regional work plans to
ensure ongoing outreach and involvement efforts.
3. November 1, 2003: Complete annual update of Communications
Office Emergency Plan and evaluation of existing and needed
resources.
4. December 1, 2003: Develop 2004 schedule of media education
opportunities. Work with Focus Areas to develop range of educational
materials. Work with Focus Area G and LHJs to develop local and
regional presentations. Launch enhanced media resource Web site;
work with key LHJs on regional media resource Web site planning.
5. September 1, 2003 (quarterly reviews): Develop work plans for
assisting LHJs in using the CDC’s Crisis Communication Planning
Worksheet and Toolkit. Develop preliminary plans for hospital
contacts.
6. Ongoing: Continue to share information with the CDC, LHJs,
regional administrators, emergency system partners, Focus Area and
other DOH staff through meetings, conference calls, e-mail updates,
monthly PHEPR newsletter, internal and external Web sites. Continue
to develop information channels for PHEPR-related issues with border
states and Canada. Continue to participate in regular information
forums with state, regional and local partner agencies.
7. Ongoing (quarterly reviews): With the Washington State
Hospital Association, continue to establish communication channels
with hospitals to share communication planning initiatives and
related materials (to include regional meetings and e-mail updates).
8. Ongoing (quarterly reviews): Ongoing research and assessment
of best practices and approaches regarding all-hazards emergency
planning efforts from local, state and federal resources. Quarterly
evaluation of DOH crisis and risk communication plans.
|
Responsible Parties: Identify the person(s) and/or entity assigned to
complete each task.
| Note: Collaboration is an essential component of
Focus Area F initiatives. Parties listed below will have primary
responsibilities in the completion of each task as noted, but are not
intended to reflect all partners involved in related efforts.
1. DOH Communications Director, Focus Area F Lead (DOH
Communication Systems Manager) and DOH Media Relations Manager.
2. Focus Area F Lead (DOH Communication Systems Manager), State
Emergency Communication Liaison and Regional Emergency
Communications Liaisons.
3. Focus Area F staff, DOH Communications Office Management Team.
4. DOH Communications Director, DOH Media Relations Manager,
Focus Area F Lead (DOH Communication Systems Manager), State and
Regional Emergency Communications Liaisons, LHJ Administrators and
Public Information Offices and Focus Area Leads.
5. State and Regional Emergency Communications Liaisons, Focus
Area F Lead (DOH Communication Systems Manager), DOH Communications
Director.
6. Focus Area F staff, State Emergency Communication Liaison,
Regional Emergency Communications Liaisons.
7. Focus Area F Lead (DOH Communication Systems Manager), State
and Regional Emergency Communication Liaisons, Washington State
Hospital Association Communications Director.
8. DOH Communications Office management team, Focus Area F staff,
State and Regional Emergency Communications Liaisons.
|
Evaluation Metric: How will the agency determine progress toward
successful completion of the overall recipient activity?
We will evaluate effectiveness of crisis and risk
communication planning and information dissemination efforts through
successful completion of the activities outlined above, specifically:
- Quarterly evaluations of crisis and risk communication
planning and collaborative efforts.
- Crisis and risk communication principles included in
agency’s Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan.
- All LHJs assisted in using the CDC’s Crisis
Communication Planning Worksheet and Toolkit.
- Schedules of collaborative and informational meetings
with hospital partners and other stakeholders completed.
- Development of statewide Community and Agency Partner
Matrix with an emphasis on entities providing expertise on and
communication channels to special populations.
- Web sites and other informational tools about planning
efforts, contacts and roles are created, updated and disseminated to
staff and system partners.
|
Back to top
2. Use your communication systems to conduct drills, exercises, and
training that ensure channels of communication to inform the public,
partners, and stakeholders about recommendations during public health
emergencies. (LINK WITH FOCUS AREA A) (CRITICAL BENCHMARK #24)
Strategies: What overarching approach(es) will be used to undertake
this activity?
|
1. To effectively conduct drills, exercises and trainings for
state, regional and local emergency communication systems, we will
coordinate with a variety of entities including Focus Areas A, E and
G, internal DOH divisions, the Washington State Hospital
Association, Regional Emergency Communications Liaisons, LHJs and
other system partners to create a series of related opportunities
throughout the coming year.
|
Tasks: What key tasks will be conducted in carrying out each identified
strategy?
| Key tasks for this strategy include: 1.
a) We will partner with Focus Areas A and G to include
communication activities in planned system-wide emergency exercise
in 2004. This exercise will include state, local, regional,
hospital and tribal partners.
b) We will establish a series of internal drills and exercises
for the DOH Emergency Communication Roster to ensure readiness in
the event of an emergency. As part of these exercises, we will
test information systems including: emergency Web procedures,
media and hospital notification, DOH staff and LHJ notification,
and emergency messages to key community and system partners. We
will continue to develop risk communication training opportunities
for staff.
c) We will work with the Regional Emergency Communications
Liaison Network to develop local and regional communication
drills, exercises and trainings.
d) We will work with Focus Area E to assist in testing
emergency call-down lists and procedures.
e) We will work with the Washington State Hospital Association
to further develop and test public health emergency communication
protocols
f) We will work with Focus Area G to ensure crisis and risk
communication training gaps are identified and addressed for
public health system staff
g) We will test the general public emergency phone bank, and
develop risk communication training opportunities for volunteer
phone bank staff.
|
Timeline: What are the critical milestones and completion dates for
each task?
| 1.
a) Ongoing: Participate with Focus Areas A and G in planning of
2004 full-scale bioterrorism exercise to coordinate communication
system testing. We will use this exercise to test the state’s
public information channels, message development capacity (with
Focus Areas B and D), and communication between DOH, LHJs, the
public and special populations.
b) December 1, 2003: Complete 2004 schedule for drills and
exercises for the DOH Emergency Communication Office Plan, and
2004 risk communication training schedule for DOH Emergency
Communication Roster staff.
c) August 1, 2004: Report and assessments due from Regional
Emergency Communications Liaisons who will work with LHJs to
ensure communication systems are tested as part of regional drills
and tabletop exercises throughout the year.
d) October 1, 2003 and June 1, 2004: Reports and assessments
due from Focus Area F staff working with Focus Area E in testing
emergency call-down lists and procedures.
e) January 1, 2004: Plan for development and testing of public
health emergency communication protocols completed in coordination
with the Washington State Hospital Association.
f) Ongoing: Coordination with Focus Area G in assessment of
communications training gaps and plans for building related
competencies.
g) October 15, 2003: Complete test of DOH emergency phone bank.
December 1, 2003: Complete 2004 schedule for emergency phone bank
testing and 2004 training schedule for emergency phone bank
volunteers.
|
Responsible Parties: Identify the person(s) and/or entity assigned to
complete each task.
| Note: Collaboration is an essential component of
Focus Area F initiatives. Parties listed below will have primary
responsibilities in the completion of each task as noted, but are not
intended to reflect all partners involved in related efforts. 1.
a) Focus Area F, A, B and D staff, DOH Communications Office.
b) Focus Area F Lead (DOH Communications Systems Manager), DOH
Communications Director, DOH Media Relations Manager, and staff as
assigned.
c) Regional Emergency Communication Liaisons, State Emergency
Communication Liaison, Focus Area F Lead (DOH Communication
Systems Manager).
d) DOH Public Health System Web Development Specialist (Focus
Area F), Focus Area E staff, Focus Area F Lead (DOH Communication
Systems Manager).
e) Washington State Hospital Association Communications
Director, Focus Area F Lead (DOH Communication Systems Manager),
State and Regional Emergency Communications Liaisons.
f) Focus Area F Lead (DOH Communication Systems Manager), Focus
Area G Lead, State and Regional Emergency Communications Liaisons,
Regional Learning Specialists.
g) Focus Area F Lead (DOH Communication Systems Manager), DOH
Public Health System Content Development Specialist (Focus Area
F), DOH Divisional Planners.
|
Evaluation Metric: How will the agency determine progress toward
successful completion of the overall recipient activity?
Success will be measured by completion of activities
outlined above, specifically:
- Participation in 2004 emergency exercises (coordinated
through Focus Area A); assessment of communication system
performance.
- Completion and implementation of 2004 schedule for
drills and exercises for the DOH Emergency Communication Office
Plan, and 2004 risk communication training schedule for DOH
Emergency Communication Roster staff.
- Completion of system testing and assessment reports
from Regional Emergency Communication Liaisons.
- Assessment of data from Focus Area F staff working with
Focus Area E in testing emergency call-down lists and procedures.
- Plan for development and testing of public health
emergency communication protocols completed in coordination with the
Washington State Hospital Association, and collaboration underway.
- Assessment of communications training gaps and plans
for building related competencies completed with Focus Area G.
- DOH emergency phone bank testing completed; volunteer
training opportunities developed and training schedule implemented.
|
Back to top
3. (HRSA/CDC Cross-Cutting Activity) Complete a plan for activities
that will be implemented to meet the specific needs of special
populations that include but not limited to people with disabilities,
minority groups, the non-English speaking, children, and the elderly.
Consider all operational and infrastructure issues as well as public
information/risk communication strategies. Such activities must be
integrated between the public health and the hospital communities.
Strategies: What overarching approach(es) will be used to undertake
this activity?
| Along with immediate emergency preparedness and
response issues, a primary goal in this area is to enhance the public
health system’s capacity to create sustainable systems to meet the
ongoing information needs of special populations. To effectively
address these issues, we will continue to build on the foundation of
resources, partnerships and communication channels established during
the last year, and expand on these activities to develop a
comprehensive statewide system. There are four main strategies to
accomplish these goals:
1. Further develop effective partnerships (internal and external)
with DOH programs, state and local agencies, hospitals and community
organizations serving special populations.
2. With Focus Area G, work to identify and provide cultural
competency training and learning opportunities to system partners.
Incorporate cultural competency issues into risk communication
training.
3. Further enhance materials development and translation systems
that test messages for effectiveness and cultural appropriateness
with target audiences.
4. Ensure special populations are addressed in crisis and risk
communication plan development.
|
Tasks: What key tasks will be conducted in carrying out each identified
strategy?
|
1.
a. Complete internal (state) review of existing outreach
channels to special populations.
b. With the Washington State Hospital Association and Regional
Emergency Communications Liaisons, develop statewide Community and
Agency Partner Matrix with emphasis on organizations serving
special populations.
c. Identify opportunities for resource development for and
information dissemination to key audiences through partnerships
with organizations in matrix, including—but not limited to—the
following:
DOH Division of Community and Family Health (various programs
serving families, the elderly and other special populations),
Governor’s Office on Indian Affairs, Washington State Department
of Social and Health Services (including offices of Aging and
Adult Services, Children and Family Services, Mental Health
Services, Deaf Services, Residential Care Services), Washington
State Council of the Blind, Asian American Affairs Commission,
Washington State Human Rights Commission, Washington State Office
of Public Instruction, Washington State Department of the Military
(Emergency Management Division, Public Education Unit), Washington
State Coalition for the Homeless, American Red Cross (local
offices), Association of County Human Services, and other state,
regional and local entities serving special populations.
2.
d. With Focus Area G and other partners (including DOH Minority
Affairs office and other state and local resources) identify
opportunities for cultural competency training. Ensure
opportunities—such as Government-to-Government Training through
the Governor’s Office of Indian Affairs—are available system-wide.
e. Work with Focus Area G to establish other training channels
such as distance learning on relevant issues.
f. Address cultural competency issues and resources in risk
communication training offered through Focus Area F.
3.
g. Partner with DOH Division of Community and Family
Health--Office of Health Promotion, in their efforts to establish
a structured translation and review resource for public health
materials. This program will work with community organizations to
ensure cultural appropriateness and effectiveness of messages and
materials with target audiences.
h. Continue Focus Area F program (in consultation with all
Focus Areas) to translate key emergency materials into top six
languages as identified by Washington State Department of Social
and Health Services (Spanish, Russian, Vietnamese, Cambodian,
Chinese, Korean) and support local efforts to establish other
needed translation mechanisms.
i. Continue work to ensure accessibility of materials, Web
sites, emergency hotlines and other resources for communities with
special needs. Support implementation of critical services—as
appropriate—including Access Washington Resource Directory
(statewide health and human services database that serves as the
backbone of local 211 efforts), TTY lines, AT&T Language Line
services.
4.
j. Seeking expertise from an advisory panel established through
the Community and Agency Partner Matrix established through work
in Key Task A (above), as well as other Focus Areas, DOH
divisions, federal, state, local and regional resources, we will
work to include special populations in state and local crisis and
risk communication planning.
|
Timeline: What are the critical milestones and completion dates for
each task?
1.
a. Ongoing (updates due December 1, 2003, April 1, 2004, August
1, 2004): Work with DOH divisional planners and key program staff
to review existing outreach channels.
b-c. Ongoing (updates due December 1, 2003, April 1, 2004, August
1, 2004): With Regional Emergency Communication Liaisons and
Washington State Hospital Association, develop statewide Community and Agency Partner Matrix with an
emphasis on organizations providing expertise and communication channels for
mental health issues, services for the hearing and sight impaired, and special
populations including minority and non-English speaking communities, the elderly, children and
families. Develop state and regional workplans to ensure ongoing outreach and involvement
efforts.
2.
d-f. Ongoing (annual assessment due August 1, 2004): Identify
gaps and related competency building resources regarding cultural
competency issues. Ensure cultural competency is effectively
addressed in risk communication training.
3.
g. Ongoing: Support translation program developed with DOH
Division of Community and Family Health - Office of Health
Promotion, and use services (program test completed November 1,
2003). Review materials for translation
h. Ongoing: Continue to review and translate critical
materials.
i. Ongoing (assessments due December 1, 2003, April 1, 2004,
August 1, 2004): Continue to enhance Web sites, materials and
emergency hotline accessibility for communities with special
needs. Support implementation of critical services—as
appropriate—including Access Washington Resource Directory
(statewide health and human services database that serves as the
backbone of local 211 efforts), TTY lines, AT&T Language Line
services.
4.
a. Ongoing (quarterly assessments): Continued review of crisis
and risk communication plan development (state, local) to ensure
special populations and cultural issues are adequately addressed.
Continued development of advisory panel as outlined in Key Task D
(above) to assist in related issues. Best practices
exchange on related issues with hospitals through the Washington
State Hospital Association.
|
Responsible Parties: Identify the person(s) and/or entity assigned to
complete each task.
|
Note: Collaboration is an essential component of Focus Area F
initiatives. Parties listed below will have primary responsibilities
in the completion of each task as noted, but are not intended to
reflect all partners involved in related efforts.
1.
a. Focus Areaq F staff, DOH divisional leads and related
programs.
b-c. Focus Area F Lead (DOH Communication Systems Manager),
State and Regional Emergency Communications Liaisons, Washington
State Hospital Association Communications Director.
2.
a-c. Focus Area F and Focus Area G staff, State and Regional
Communications Liaisons.
3.
a. Focus Area F staff, DOH Division of Community and Family
Health - Office of Health Promotion, other DOH Division and Focus
Area staff as appropriate for materials review and development.
b. Focus Area F staff, State and Regional Communications
Liaisons, Focus Area staff and DOH Communications Office staff, as
appropriate.
c. Focus Area F staff, State and Regional Communications
Liaisons, DOH Web Team, DOH Division and Focus Area staff as
appropriate.
4.
a. Focus Area F Lead (DOH Communication Systems Manager), State and
Regional
Emergency Communications Liaisons, Washington State Hospital
Association
Communications Director.
|
Evaluation Metric: How will the agency determine progress toward
successful completion of the overall recipient activity?
| Progress will be measured through successful
completion of above activities as evidenced through required
assessments, Community and Agency Partner Matrix and advisory panel
development, and availability of key materials, resources and
communication channels providing effective information dissemination
to special populations.
|
Back to top
4. Assess state and local public information needs and identify
communication resources needed for the public distribution of supplies
through the National Pharmaceutical Stockpile program (12-hour "push
packages" as well as the vendor managed inventory). Assessments and
plans should consider language barriers, cultural sensitivities,
hearing and sight impairment, and the means by which population groups
and communities get information. (LINK WITH FOCUS AREA A, and CROSS
CUTTING ACTIVITY POPULATIONS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS, PSYCHOSOCIAL
NEEDS, Attachment X)
Strategies: What overarching approach(es) will be used to undertake
this activity?
- We will use our full range of communication assessment and
outreach mechanisms as well as partnerships and initiatives
established to address psychosocial needs and support effective
information dissemination to the general public and special
populations. In coordination with Focus Area A and using specific
information outlined in Module 9 (National Pharmaceutical
Stockpile Program) of the CDC’s Crisis and Risk Communication
manual, we will develop a preliminary communication plan for local
efforts surrounding this program. We will then work in cooperation
with the Regional Emergency Communications Liaison Network and the
Washington State Hospital Association to develop a comprehensive
final plan.
We will use the DOH Emergency Communication Plan model
(successfully tested on other topics such as smallpox vaccinations
and West Nile Virus) and the CDC’s City and County Health
Department Crisis Communication Planning Worksheet and Toolkit
as the foundation for the NPS Communication Plan.
- To ensure psychosocial issues and the needs of special
populations are addressed, we will seek expertise, resource
development and information dissemination assistance through a
Community and Agency Partner Matrix including—but not limited to—DOH
Division of Community and Family Health (various programs serving
families, the elderly and other special populations), Governor’s
Office on Indian Affairs, Washington State Department of Social
and Health Services (including offices of Aging and Adult
Services, Children and Family Services, Mental Health Services,
Deaf Services, Residential Care Services), Washington State
Council of the Blind, Washington State Commissions (including
Asian American, Hispanic and African American Affairs
Commissions), Washington State Human Rights Commission, Washington
State Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction,
Washington State Department of the Military (Emergency Management
Division, Public Education Unit), Washington State Coalition for
the Homeless, American Red Cross (local offices), Association of
County Human Services, local contacts for the American Psychiatric
Association, and other state, regional and local entities serving
special populations.
|
Tasks: What key tasks will be conducted in carrying out each
identified strategy?
| 1. a. We will review LHJ and hospital communication
assessments completed in 2002-2003.
We will also review recent LHJ communication needs assessments from
Regional Emergency Communications Liaisons, and seek input from
hospitals through the
Washington State Hospital Association.
b. We will participate in related planning efforts with Focus Area
A.
c. We will develop a preliminary communication plan; we will build
on this plan through
collaboration with Regional Emergency Communication Liaisons, the
Washington State Hospital Association and LHJ Public Information
Managers.
d. We will complete state communication plan for NPS Program, and
will disseminate
recommendations for related local, regional and hospital plans
through collaborations
with Regional Emergency Communication Liaisons, the Washington
State Hospital
Association and LHJ Public Information Managers.
2.
a. We will work with identified internal/external partners
(Community and Agency Partner Matrix as outlined in Overarching
Approaches section above) to ensure effectiveness of pre-event
and emergency materials for key audience groups.
b. We will work with mental health resources identified in the
Community and Agency Partner Matrix (see above) and other
resources such as the State Employee Assistance Program to address
psychosocial issues related to crisis for the general public and
involved staff.
|
Timeline: What are the critical milestones and completion dates for
each task?
| 1.
a) January 1, 2004: Review of assessments completed.
b) Ongoing: Participation in related planning efforts with
Focus Area A.
c) February 1, 2004: Preliminary NPS Communication Plan
completed; review and collaboration with system partners
initiated.
d) June 1, 2004: Final NPS Communication Plan guidance issued
in collaboration with Regional Emergency Communications Liaison
Network, Washington State Hospital Association, LHJs and other
system partners.
2.
a) Ongoing (review assessments due April 1, 2004, August 1,
2004): We will work with identified internal/external partners
(Community and Agency Partner Matrix as outlined in Overarching
Approaches section above) to ensure effectiveness of pre-event
and emergency materials for key audience groups.
b) Ongoing (assessments due April 1, 2004, August 1, 2004):
With Community and Agency Partner Matrix (see above) develop
related mental health resources and ensure psychosocial
consequences of crisis are addressed in materials for staff and
general public. Review and disseminate related information to
general public and staff—as appropriate—including materials from
the American Red Cross, and the CDC (Emotional Health Issues for
Those Responding to a Crisis, Module 10 in the CDC’s Crisis and
Risk Communication Guide).
|
Responsible Parties: Identify the person(s) and/or entity assigned to
complete each task.
| Note: Collaboration is an essential component of
Focus Area F initiatives. Parties listed below will have primary
responsibilities in the completion of each task as noted, but are not
intended to reflect all partners involved in related efforts. 1.
a) Focus Area F staff, State and Regional Emergency
Communications Liaisons, Washington State Hospital Association.
b) Focus Areas F and A, DOH Communications Office Management
Team.
c) Focus Area F staff, DOH Communications Office Management
Team, State and Regional Emergency Communications Liaisons,
Washington State Hospital Association.
d) Communications Office Management Team, Focus Area F staff,
Regional Emergency Communications Liaison Network, Washington
State Hospital Association, LHJ public information offices, and
other system partners.
2.
a) Focus Area F Lead (DOH Communication Systems Manager), State
and Regional Emergency Communications Liaisons, Washington State
Hospital Association Communications Director, members of Community
and Agency Partner Matrix.
b) Focus Area F Lead (DOH Communication Systems Manager), State
and Regional Emergency Communications Liaisons, Washington State
Hospital Association Communications Director, members of Community
and Agency Partner Matrix.
|
Evaluation Metric: How will the agency determine progress toward
successful completion of the overall recipient activity?
| Success will be measured through the completion of a
comprehensive DOH NPS Communication Plan, and dissemination of NPS
Communication planning guidance throughout public health and hospital
system. Additional measurements will include the successful
implementation of resources and development of materials to address
psychosocial issues and the needs of special populations as outlined
in Key Tasks above. |
Back to top
5. Coordinate risk communication planning with key state and local
government and non-government emergency response partners (e.g.
municipal emergency operation centers and chapters of the American Red
Cross).
Strategies: What overarching approach(es) will be used to undertake
this activity?
|
1. We will continue to strengthen and expand outreach and
collaboration efforts through a variety of channels, including links
with all Focus Areas, Public Health Emergency Preparedness and
Response Management Team, and related local, regional and state
advisory committees.
2. We will continue to provide regular briefings and updates on
risk communication planning issues to Washington State Secretary of
Health, other DOH executive staff, the Governor’s Office, and other
key state, local and regional officials.
3. We will continue to seek opportunities to build awareness of
risk communication issues pertaining to public health, to foster
understanding of public health’s role in an emergency, and to build
collaborative relationships with emergency response system partners.
4. We will work to develop risk communication protocols on shared
issues with emergency response partners including: Washington State
Hospital Association, LHJ public information offices, Washington
State Crisis and Emergency Management Association (with Focus Area
A), Washington State Emergency Management Division, Washington State
Emergency Communications Team (Governor’s Office), Washington State
Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction- School Safety
Center, the American Red Cross (local chapters) and other
associations, community and government organizations representing
first responders and emergency partners.
5. We will work with DOH and LHJ offices that have established
partnerships with key emergency response agencies and organizations
to create collaborative outreach initiatives.
|
Tasks: What key tasks will be conducted in carrying out each identified
strategy?
|
1.
a) To share information and gain understanding of issues
impacting all areas of emergency planning, we will participate in
regular meetings and briefings with Public Health Emergency
Preparedness and Response team including Focus Areas, and local,
regional and state advisory committees.
b) We will continue to build partnerships with key state and
local government and non-government agencies, and will proactively
pursue opportunities to participate in risk communication strategy
discussions.
c) We will continue to develop partnerships within DOH and LHJs
to ensure a comprehensive approach to risk communication planning.
2.
a) To ensure senior officials have a comprehensive
understanding of risk communication planning issues, we will
regularly brief the Washington State Secretary of Health and other
senior DOH staff, Washington State Association of Local Public
Health Officials, the Washington State Board of Health, the
Governor’s office and other key state, local and regional
officials.
3.
a) To assist in building awareness of risk communication issues
and planning efforts related to public health, we will develop
versions of crisis and risk communications training (based on
CDCynergy model) for key emergency response partners, and continue
to develop other mechanisms (such as monthly risk communication
sections in our Public Health Emergency Preparedness and Response
Newsletter, Web-based resources, materials and presentations) to
share related information and best practices.
4.
a) We will continue to work with Focus Area A, senior DOH and
public health staff, LHJ public information offices, the
Washington State Hospital Association and other system partners to
identify opportunities to build shared emergency communication
protocols.
5.
a) We will continue to build partnerships to foster development
of shared emergency communication protocols—as appropriate—with
emergency response partners.
|
Timeline: What are the critical milestones and completion dates for
each task?
1.
a) Ongoing (quarterly updates): Participate in meetings and
briefings with Public Health Emergency Preparedness and Response
team including Focus Areas and local, regional and state
advisory committees.
b-c) Ongoing (quarterly updates): Initiate meetings with key
DOH and LHJ programs to build awareness of risk communication
planning efforts and develop shared communication protocols, as
appropriate.
2.
a) Ongoing (quarterly updates): Regularly brief senior
officials on issues pertaining to risk communication planning.
3.
a) Ongoing (quarterly assessments): Training, resources
(newsletter, Web library, materials and presentations) for
emergency response partners to assist in building awareness of
risk communication issues and planning efforts related to public
health.
4.
a) Ongoing (quarterly updates): Continue to develop shared
emergency communications protocols with emergency response partners, as appropriate.
5.
a) Ongoing (quarterly updates): We will continue to build
partnerships with key state and local government and
non-government agencies, and will proactively pursue opportunities
to participate in risk communication strategy discussions.
|
Responsible Parties: Identify the person(s) and/or entity assigned to
complete each task.
| Note: Collaboration is an essential component of
Focus Area F initiatives. Parties listed below will have primary
responsibilities in the completion of each task as noted, but are not
intended to reflect all partners involved in related efforts. 1.
a-c) Focus Area F staff, State and Regional Emergency
Communications Liaisons.
2.
a) DOH Director of Communications, Focus Area F Lead (DOH
Communication Systems Manager), DOH Media Relations Manager, LHJ
Public Information Managers or designated emergency communications
staff, State and Regional Emergency Communications Liaisons, as
appropriate.
3.
a) Focus Area F staff.
4.
a) DOH Director of Communications, Focus Area F Lead (DOH
Communication Systems Manager), DOH Media Relations Manager,
Washington State Hospital Association Communications Director, LHJ
Public Information Managers or designated emergency communications
staff, State and Regional Emergency Communications Liaisons, as
appropriate.
5.
a) DOH Director of Communications, Focus Area F Lead (DOH
Communication Systems Manager), DOH Media Relations Manager,
Washington State Hospital Association Communications Director, LHJ
Public Information Managers or designated emergency communications
staff, State and Regional Emergency Communications Liaisons, as
appropriate.
|
Evaluation Metric: How will the agency determine progress toward
successful completion of the overall recipient activity?
| Progress toward completion of the activities outlined
in this section will be measured through required quarterly
assessments/updates for each Key Task. |
Back to top
6. Establish capabilities to provide "hotline" services when
needed, including those that provide mental health services. (LINK
WITH CROSS CUTTING ACTIVITY PSYCHOSOCIAL CONSEQUENCES,
Attachment X)
Strategies: What overarching approach(es) will be used to undertake
this activity?
|
1. In the event of a public health emergency, intergovernmental
training activity or other high profile event, the Washington State
Secretary of Health may activate statewide emergency hotline
services at DOH to handle calls from the general public.
Capabilities for this staffed phone bank were implemented in 2002.
To ensure operability, we maintain a roster of at least 65 volunteer
staff from throughout DOH. Volunteer qualifications include the
ability to work effectively with the public in a crisis or emergency
situation.
2. We will continue to enhance emergency hotline services by
identifying mental health resources through development of a
Community and Agency Partner Matrix to include: Washington State
Department of Social and Health Services (including offices of Aging
and Adult Services, Children and Family Services, Mental Health
Services), American Red Cross (local offices), Association of County
Human Services, local contacts for the American Psychiatric
Association, Washington State Employee Assistance Program and other
related state, regional and local entities. Working with these
partners—and DOH programs with similar expertise—we will develop
training opportunities, consumer messages, and a resource list to
address psychosocial issues. (We will also continue our
participation in statewide initiatives to build capacity in this
area, and will explore other services such as Human Link.)
3. We will continue to promote the CDC’s general public hotlines,
and will implement new capacities to locally serve non-English
speaking callers and special needs populations. We will also assist
LHJs and other system partners in development of emergency phone
scripts and Q&As regarding public health emergency topics including
biological, chemical and nuclear threats. We will assist LHJs with
related planning efforts for local needs.
4. The DOH Communications Office has also created emergency phone
bank capacity to assist LHJs and the media in the event of a public
health emergency (implemented in 2002). To ensure operability, we
maintain an Emergency Communications Office roster of at least 25
DOH staff with specific communication skills.
|
Tasks: What key tasks will be conducted in carrying out each identified
strategy?
| 1.
a) Develop risk communication training for volunteer emergency
phone bank staff and implement a regular schedule of phone bank
testing
2.
a) Identify mental health resources through the establishment
of Community and Agency Partner Matrix (as outlined above). Enlist
expertise of partners in creating training opportunities, consumer
messages and mental health resource list to assist phone bank
staff in effectively addressing psychosocial issues.
b) Support statewide initiatives to develop and maintain health
and human services resource directories.
c) Assess and initiate enhancements to better serve special
needs of various communities such as TTY lines, AT&T Language
Line, and recorded emergency messages.
3.
a) Work with Focus Areas A, B, C and D, and DOH divisions
(Epidemiology and Public Health Laboratories, Community and Family
Health, and Environmental Health) to further develop messages and
Q&As regarding public health emergency topics including
biological, chemical and nuclear threats.
b) Ensure emergency messages and Q&As are available throughout
emergency partner system (including hospitals). Assess local
needs.
4.
a) Continue to maintain and regularly test emergency DOH
Communications Office capabilities.
|
Timeline: What are the critical milestones and completion dates for
each task?
| 1.
a) October 15, 2003: Complete test of DOH emergency phone bank.
December 1, 2003: Complete 2004 schedule for emergency phone bank
testing and 2004 training schedule for emergency phone bank
volunteers.
2.
a) Ongoing (assessments due December 1, 2003, April 1, 2004,
August 1, 2004): With Community and Agency Partner Matrix (see
above) develop related mental health resources and ensure
psychosocial consequences of crisis are addressed in materials for
staff and general public.
b) Ongoing (quarterly reviews): Continue to participate in
Access Washington Resource Directory (statewide health and human
services database which will serve as backbone of Washington’s 211
initiative) development and planning meetings.
c) Ongoing (quarterly reviews): Continue to develop and
implement emergency phone bank enhancements to better serve
special populations.
3.
a) Ongoing (quarterly reviews): Continue to assess and develop
messages regarding public health emergency topics. Compile
resource manual for emergency phone bank volunteers.
b) Ongoing (quarterly reviews): Continue to disseminate
emergency messages and Q&As throughout emergency partner system.
Work with Washington State Hospital Association and Focus Area A
to expand outreach.
4.
a) October 15, 2003: Complete test of DOH emergency
Communications Office phone system. December 1, 2003: Complete
2004 schedule for emergency Communications Office system testing
and 2004 schedule for Emergency Roster staff training.
|
Responsible Parties: Identify the person(s) and/or entity assigned to
complete each task.
| Note: Collaboration is an essential component of
Focus Area F initiatives. Parties listed below will have primary
responsibilities in the completion of each task as noted, but are not
intended to reflect all partners involved in related efforts.
1a) Focus Area F staff; DOH divisional planners.
2a) Focus Area F Lead (DOH Communication Systems Manager), State
Emergency Communications Liaison, key members of Community and
Agency Partner Matrix.
2b) Focus Area F staff.
2c) Focus Area F staff, State and Regional Emergency
Communications Liaisons.
3a) Focus Area F staff, DOH Communications Office Management
Team, Focus Areas A, B, C and D, and DOH divisions (Epidemiology and
Public Health Laboratories, Community and Family Health, and
Environmental Health).
3b) Focus Area F Lead (DOH Communication Systems Manager), State
and Regional Emergency Communications Liaisons, Washington State
Hospital Association Communications Director.
4a) DOH Communications Office Management Team; Focus Area F
staff.
|
Evaluation Metric: How will the agency determine progress toward
successful completion of the overall recipient activity?
| Enhancements to the DOH emergency phone bank and
related public health system resources will be measured by completion
of above tasks as documented through quarterly assessments by key
staff and system partners. |
Back to top
7. Train key state & local public health spokespersons in crisis
and emergency risk communication principles and standards.
Strategies: What overarching approach(es) will be used to undertake
this activity?
|
1. DOH will send staff to the CDC’s Emergency Risk
Communication Train-the-Trainer course and will provide training
to Regional Emergency Communication Liaison staff to enhance
statewide emergency risk communication training capacity.
Additionally, DOH will send staff to other CDC trainings including
Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication and Facing the
Media to enhance overall completeness of support system for
internal and external system partners.
2. Coordinating with Focus Area G, the Washington State Hospital
Association, and other DOH divisions and system partners, a
comprehensive system of risk and crisis communication training
opportunities will be offered throughout the state. These will
include:
- The Risk Communication in Public Health
course (based on CDCynergy model) provides information for
public health, hospital and other emergency response partners on
the basics of risk communication. This course is targeted toward
people who don’t regularly work with the media. It demonstrates
that risk communication principles are part of everyone’s
ongoing work—from the receptionist answering the phone, to the
epidemiologist posting information on a general public Web site,
to the health officer or administrator answering questions in an
official capacity. The training discusses basic skills needed
for clear, effective communication and message delivery, the
importance of cultural competency in communications, and advice
on understanding and meeting the needs of specific audiences.
Participants receive tools for planning effective communication
strategies and tips for addressing possible challenges of crisis
communication. The course also addresses how risk communication
pertains to public health, and the importance of establishing
clear communication channels between emergency system partners.
- DOH Media and Risk Communication Training is
currently available to DOH programs, and other system partners.
This course will be enhanced to include specific issues
addressed in the CDC’s Crisis and Emergency Risk
Communication and Facing the Media training to ensure
consistency of risk communication tools and strategies. The
course focuses on how to develop messages, effectively work with
reporters, and ensure risk communication strategies are
integrated into public information efforts. It offers tools and
tips for effectively disseminating information in an emergency.
- When appropriate, combined versions of the above
courses will be offered.
- Ongoing risk communication strategy assistance is available
to DOH programs, LHJs and emergency system partners through the
DOH Communications Office, and through the Regional Emergency
Communications Liaison Network. Additionally, risk communication
tools and resources will be made available to LHJs, hospitals and
other emergency response partners on an ongoing basis.
|
Tasks: What key tasks will be conducted in carrying out each identified
strategy?
| 1.
a) The Focus Area F Lead (Communication Systems Manager) and
State Emergency Communication Liaison will attend the CDC’s
Train the Trainer program.
b) Focus Area F Lead and State Emergency Communication Liaison
will train the Regional Emergency Communication Liaisons (with
material from CDC’s Train the Trainer program) in order to
provide a network of training resources statewide.
c) The DOH Communications Director will complete the CDC’s
Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication course and ensure
principles are included in DOH Media and Risk Communication
Training.
d) The DOH Media Relations Manager will complete the CDC’s
Facing the Media course and ensure principles are included in
DOH Media and Risk Communication Training.
2.
a) Continue to deliver risk communication training to LHJ, DOH,
and system staff.
b) Develop abbreviated version of combined risk communication
and media trainings for public health staff at 2003 Washington
State Joint Health Conference.
c) Develop risk communication training programs targeting
specific audiences such as state and local health spokespeople and
other key staff throughout the system. DOH will also partner with
the Washington State Hospital Association to develop and co-host
risk communication training for hospital staff in Washington
State.
3.
a) Develop and disseminate crisis and risk communication tools
to system partners including printing and distributing CDC’s
Crisis & Emergency Risk Communication wallet card, featuring
communication tools and resources in monthly Public Health
Emergency Preparedness and Response e-newsletter, developing
internal/external Web sites with risk communication information
for staff and system partners.
|
Timeline: What are the critical milestones and completion dates for
each task?
| 1.
a) November 1, 2003: DOH Focus Area F Lead (Communication
Systems Manager) and State Emergency Communication Liaison will
complete the CDC’s Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication
Train the Trainer course and ensure principles are included in
risk communication training for LHJs, hospitals and system
partners.
b) December 31, 2003: Training of Regional Emergency
Communications Liaisons completed in risk communication.
c) March 1, 2004: The DOH Communications Director will complete
the CDC’s Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication course.
d) March 1, 2004: The DOH Media Relations Manager will complete
the CDC’s Facing the Media course.
2.
a) Ongoing (quarterly assessments): Deliver risk communications
training to public health staff statewide.
b) October 10, 2003: Presentation on media and risk
communication in public health offered at the Washington State
Joint Health Conference.
c) January 31, 2004: Courses developed for LHJs, hospitals and
other key internal/external emergency system partners. Training
plans developed by Regional Emergency Communications Liaisons, DOH
and the Washington State Hospital Association through August,
2004.
3.
a) Ongoing (reviews due January 1, 2004, August 1, 2004):
Develop and disseminate risk communication tools and resources
throughout emergency partner system.
|
Responsible Parties: Identify the person(s) and/or entity assigned to
complete each task.
| Note: Collaboration is an essential component of
Focus Area F initiatives. Parties listed below will have primary
responsibilities in the completion of each task as noted, but are not
intended to reflect all partners involved in related efforts.
1a) DOH Focus Area F Lead (Communication Systems Manager), State
Emergency Communication Liaison.
1b) DOH Focus Area F Lead (Communication Systems Manager), State
Emergency Communication Liaison.
1c) DOH Communications Director.
1d) DOH Media Relations Manager.
2a) Focus Area F Lead (DOH Communication Systems Manager), State
and Regional Emergency Communication Liaisons, Focus Area G, DOH
Communications Director and Media Relations Manager, as appropriate.
2b) Focus Area F Lead (DOH Communication Systems Manager), State
Emergency Communications Liaison, DOH Media Relations Manager.
2c) Focus Area F Lead (DOH Communication Systems Manager), State
and Regional Emergency Communication Liaisons, Focus Area G, DOH
Communications Director and Media Relations Manager, as appropriate.
3a) Focus Area F staff, Focus Area G staff, State and Regional
Emergency Communications Liaisons.
|
Evaluation Metric: How will the agency determine progress toward
successful completion of the overall recipient activity?
Progress will be evaluated by successful completion
of the above Key Tasks, specifically:
- Completion of CDC courses and incorporation of
materials into all risk communication trainings offered through
Focus Area F.
- Completion of liaison training.
- Completion of training plans for key system partners.
- Training assessments from participants.
- Incorporation of risk communication principles into
other trainings and consultations offered by DOH Communications
Office.
- Establishment of ongoing network of risk communication
training resources and materials for LHJs, hospitals, and other
internal/external system partners, as assessed through quarterly
evaluations.
|
Back to top
8. (Smallpox) Enumerate participants in a public information
system, including call-down lists of public health and clinical
contacts that can be activated to address communications and
information dissemination issues regarding smallpox. (See Appendix 4,
IT Function #7) (LINK WITH FOCUS AREA E)
Strategies: What overarching approach(es) will be used to undertake
this activity?
1. Make use of currently available call-down and
notification systems. They include:
- DOH Communications Office Emergency Notification List
(including Senior DOH staff and divisional contacts, LHJ Public
Information Managers, Governor’s Office, State Agency
Communications Directors, Emergency Operations Centers contacts).
Emergency strategy also includes emergency media and DOH staff
notification mechanisms.
- Washington State Hospital Association Notification
List (hospital communications and public information contacts).
- LHJ Smallpox Spokesperson List (maintained through
Focus Area F).
- State, Regional and Local Emergency Response
Coordinators (part of Public Health Emergency Preparedness and
Response program).
- Health Alert Network (HAN).
- Washington State Association of Local Public Health
Officers (WSALPHO).
- Washington State Communicable Disease distribution
list (WA-Comdis).
- Emergency call-down lists (state, local and regional)
administered by Focus Area A.
2. Continue to assist in development of communication protocols
for comprehensive call-down systems Focus Area E is establishing
through the Washington State Electronic Communication, Urgent
Response and Exchange System (WA-SECURES) program.
3. Continue work with the Community and Agency Partner Matrix to
ensure community partners and special needs populations are included
in information dissemination strategies. We will develop related
state, regional and local protocols for matrix list activation.
|
Tasks: What key tasks will be conducted in carrying out each identified
strategy?
| 1.
a) Continue to develop and maintain DOH Communications Office
Emergency Notification List, as well as media and staff emergency
notification mechanisms.
b) Continue to develop and maintain Washington State Hospital
Association Notification List.
c) Continue to develop and maintain LHJ Smallpox Spokesperson
List.
d) Assist Focus Areas and DOH programs, as appropriate, with
developing communication protocols for information dissemination
channels.
2.
a) Continue to work with Focus Area E in development of
communication protocols for HAN and WA-SECURES notification
systems.
3.
a) Continue to build effective information dissemination
channels to target populations through work with Community and
Agency Partner Matrix.
|
Timeline: What are the critical milestones and completion dates for
each task?
| 1.
a) Ongoing (quarterly reviews): Continue to develop and
maintain DOH Communications Office Emergency Notification List,
and media and DOH staff emergency notification mechanisms.
b) Ongoing (quarterly reviews): Continue to develop and
maintain Washington State Hospital Association Notification List.
c) Ongoing (quarterly reviews): Continue to develop and
maintain LHJ Smallpox Spokesperson List.
d) Ongoing (quarterly reviews): Assist Focus Areas and DOH
programs, as appropriate, with developing communication protocols
for information dissemination channels.
2.
a) Ongoing (quarterly reviews): Continue to work with Focus
Area E in development of communication protocols for HAN and
WA-SECURES lists.
3.
a) Ongoing (progress reports due December 1, 2003, April 1,
2004, August 1, 2004): Develop effective information dissemination
channels to target populations.
|
Responsible Parties: Identify the person(s) and/or entity assigned to
complete each task.
| Note: Collaboration is an essential component of
Focus Area F initiatives. Parties listed below will have primary
responsibilities in the completion of each task as noted, but are not
intended to reflect all partners involved in related efforts.
1a) DOH Communications Office Management Team.
1b) Focus Area F Lead (DOH Communication Systems Manager),
Washington State Hospital Association Communications Director.
1c) State Emergency Communications Liaison.
1d) Focus Area F staff.
2a) Focus Area F and E staff.
3a) Focus Area F Lead (DOH Communication Systems Manager), State
and Regional Emergency Communications Liaisons, DOH Communications
Office Manager Team.
|
Evaluation Metric: How will the agency determine progress toward
successful completion of the overall recipient activity?
| Progress will be determined through required
quarterly reviews and assessments of activities in this area.
Additionally, assessment tools developed as part of Focus Area F,
Section 12 response will be used to measure effectiveness of
information dissemination channels and efforts. |
Back to top
9. (Smallpox) Develop communications materials for dissemination
regarding smallpox training and education for local stakeholders, such
as community members, school representatives, physician, local
emergency service responders, and the general public.
Strategies: What overarching approach(es) will be used to undertake
this activity?
|
1. We will build on materials development and dissemination
mechanisms created through DOH Smallpox and Smallpox Immunization
Communication Plans (developed in 2002). Goals of these
communication plans include:
- Build and maintain confidence in Washington State’s
public health system and its ability to respond to—and effectively
manage—a smallpox outbreak.
- Work with federal, regional and local authorities to
provide a united voice for public health.
- Minimize public panic and fears related to smallpox.
- Address—as quickly as possible—rumors and
inaccuracies.
- Provide clear, accurate, consistent and highly
accessible information to the public, special needs populations,
health care providers, emergency system partners, policy-makers,
and other local stakeholders.
Key elements of these communication plans include:
- Proactive education.
- Effective and coordinated use of resources.
- Systems for rapid information dissemination.
- Outreach to key partners and special populations.
Linking with the CDC, Focus Areas B and G, and DOH programs
involved in activities related to smallpox and smallpox vaccine
issues, we will continue to develop audience-specific informational
materials regarding smallpox, vaccinia, and the smallpox vaccine.
Appropriate materials will be translated and made available in
several formats. Services have been secured to obtain rapid
translation of additional materials in the event of an emergency.
To ensure psychosocial issues and the needs of special
populations are addressed, we will seek expertise, resource
development and information dissemination assistance through a
Community and Agency Partner Matrix including—but not limited to—DOH
Division of Community and Family Health (various programs serving
families, the elderly and other special populations), Governor’s
Office on Indian Affairs, Washington State Department of Social and
Health Services (including offices of Aging and Adult Services,
Children and Family Services, Mental Health Services, Deaf Services,
Residential Care Services), Washington State Council of the Blind,
Washington State Commissions (Asian American, African American and
Hispanic Affairs Commissions), Washington State Human Rights
Commission, Washington State Office of the Superintendent of Public
Instruction, Washington State Department of the Military (Emergency
Management Division, Public Education Unit), Washington State
Coalition for the Homeless, American Red Cross (local offices),
Association of County Human Services, local contacts for the
American Psychiatric Association, and other state, regional and
local entities serving special populations.
In 2003, we worked with Focus Area B to develop smallpox
education materials such as Children and the Smallpox Vaccine,
and Pets and Vaccinia, in response to requests from matrix
partners.
|
Tasks: What key tasks will be conducted in carrying out each identified
strategy?
| 1.
a) Assess materials that have already been developed. Determine
key materials and appropriate translations.
b) Assess needed materials and determine best format.
c) Determine best mechanisms for disseminating materials to
target audience groups, emergency response partners and other
stakeholders.
d) Develop key message templates for LHJ and hospital use.
e) Review and update design of smallpox information pages on
DOH Web site.
f) Continue to assess related training and education materials
needs and effective delivery channels with Focus Area G.
|
Timeline: What are the critical milestones and completion dates for
each task?
| 1.
a) November 1, 2003: Initial materials assessment completed,
translation process initiated.
b) Ongoing (quarterly reviews): Continued development of needed
smallpox materials.
c) Ongoing (quarterly reviews): Continue work with Community
and Agency Partner Matrix, and other emergency system partners, to
establish effective communication channels for smallpox
information dissemination.
d) Ongoing (quarterly reviews): With input from hospital and
LHJ partners—and ensuring consistency with related CDC
materials—continue to develop messages and templates for LHJ and
hospital use.
e) December 1, 2003: Revised DOH Smallpox Web site launched.
f) Ongoing (quarterly reviews): Continuing assessment of | |